Community Record
23
Posts
11
Kudos
3
Solutions
Badges
Feb 5 2025
8:25 AM
@Mad_Dog_82 - Thank you very much for following up on this thread! I'm going to mark your reply as the solution since it seems you have found the answer (even if it's not the answer you were hoping for). Cheers!
... View more
Nov 12 2024
10:42 AM
Yeah, without any issue.
... View more
Jun 5 2024
7:08 AM
Thank you! I just sent you a message with the details.
... View more
Sep 27 2023
2:11 PM
2 Kudos
Port mirroring is typically used for troubleshooting, or special traffic conditions (eg voice recorders for VOIP). It would not be a good idea to use this for the purposes you're describing. Instead, as suggested above you should be able to achieve your outcome by simply tagging the WISP uplink traffic onto an unused vlan to send it across the fiber to the MX WAN port - Both the WISP cat5 port and the fiber port going to the MX tagged as access ports. With that said, the best option is to have the ISP run the to MDF instead.
... View more
Apr 23 2023
1:14 PM
Check out this guide on what causes WAN failover: https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Firewall_and_Traffic_Shaping/Connection_Monitoring_for_WAN_Failover Note that your connection to the ONT could be 100% stable, but if your ISPs DNS is having an issue or your ISP is having upstream connectivity issues, a failover can still occur. I had one case where the ISPs connectivity to Google's 8.8.8.8 DNS server was unreliable and caused WAN failovers.
... View more
Mar 20 2023
2:28 PM
I really appreciate both of your responses, I hope you didn't feel anything but that appreciation. We're reaching out to our rep to see if anything can be done to enable the feature. I understand that even a small change can be significant, but it really feels worth quite a bit to me as a network operator. This problem, where our DHCP clients in network A have Internet connectivity but no DNS connectivity to network B where the DNS servers live (for varying reasons), is one that clients end up experiencing way more than they need to, at least in my world. I think the benefit is large and it's another thing that makes a Meraki network 'just work' even when components on it don't.
... View more
Jan 11 2023
12:24 PM
How helpful, thank you. I don't know why I didn't find that myself.
... View more
Jul 5 2022
4:22 AM
some IPSEC implementations support responder, initiator or both implementations. It your peer is configured as an initiator only, it won't respond to the MX's attempts to initiate the tunnel.
... View more
Apr 28 2022
6:51 AM
Just had this EXACT problem on a MX85 (both WAN ports). Disabled EEE on the uplink switch, port is now stable. Do anyone know if there is a bug on this ? (its not anywhere in the release notes).
... View more
Apr 14 2022
5:08 AM
I don't think there is a choice, at least not for me. I can only delay firmware upgrade until sometime in May it seems. Clients won't be thrilled that we can't use the layer 7 rules that they want though.
... View more
My Accepted Solutions
Subject | Views | Posted |
---|---|---|
1424 | Sep 27 2023 12:29 PM | |
1327 | Jul 5 2022 4:22 AM | |
3143 | Mar 14 2022 7:33 AM |
My Top Kudoed Posts
Subject | Kudos | Views |
---|---|---|
3 | 2546 | |
2 | 802 | |
2 | 1424 | |
2 | 2639 |