Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About js7
js7
Here to help
Member since Nov 6, 2021
Dec 25 2021
Community Record
27
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Nov 28 2021
11:01 AM
My problem is 10.10.120.4 is showing VLAN 160 in the arp table, and it should be 120.
... View more
Nov 28 2021
10:53 AM
I wonder why I can't ping the NVR at 10.10.120.4 or a camera at 10.10.130.3 on the 10.10.140.0 subnet???
... View more
Nov 28 2021
9:59 AM
Thanks, I want to lock it down more, really what I am trying to do is lock down the network subnet by vlan. SO is it best to do it at the MX? For example. I don't want these three subnets to be able to access the LAN.
... View more
Nov 28 2021
9:52 AM
Thanks first rule shows Deny, but how do I specify which wireless clients can access the LAN, and what exactly is the LAN? so I know which network?
... View more
Nov 28 2021
9:40 AM
I was able to update my native vlan to the choice of my choosing being 160. I was able to change the SSID traffic to go via bridge using a vlan ID, instead of the L3 roaming option. However, I still can't ping any of the gateway's of the vlans. Thoughts?
... View more
Nov 28 2021
5:38 AM
Another ? is that I can't seem to ping any of my MX ip's from the 140 vlan wirelessly... Perhaps something needs to be configured on the switch?
... View more
Nov 28 2021
5:10 AM
Also, take a look at this screenshot of my MX. It says Native VLAN is 120, why can't it be 160?
... View more
Nov 28 2021
5:06 AM
I actually got it to work a different way before I saw your post. I want to decrease the size of my broadcast domain, and increase security. So if I choose the L3 roaming with a concentrator. Doesn't that do what I need it to do?
... View more
Nov 27 2021
6:15 PM
Take a look at screenshot. I want to setup my MX to handle all the DHCP services. I am trying to figure out how to create the SSIDs on the MR to correspond to the VLAN created on the MX.
... View more
Nov 24 2021
3:43 PM
Thanks, let me follow up next week. I’ve ordered a MR, and I’ll have some cameras connecting wireless. And some cameras connecting hard wire. But the hard wire cameras will actually be plugging directly into the NVR. And just 1 network cable from NVR to a MS switch. Is it possible to segment all of the camera traffic from the other wired and wireless traffic? Perhaps then I can then look again at summary report. I’m wanting to completely separate the camera traffic from the rest of the network because of security concerns.
... View more
Nov 24 2021
3:14 PM
They are not being view remotely. If they are, it would be only when we open the app on our phone. It’s not viewable remotely. And the NVR is storing the data on the NVR locally. Not in cloud. I do know the camera is set to continuously record meaning it doesn’t record only event or motion, but 24/7.
... View more
Nov 24 2021
1:16 PM
I just checked again, and now it is working. However, look at the snapshot... why all that usage? It is my cameras.
... View more
Nov 24 2021
11:07 AM
I went to Meraki Dashboard > Organization > Summary Report But it says view failed to load??
... View more
I am trying to learn more on using Postman, and connecting to my Meraki MX or MS, and running a script to see what the firmware version is running on it, and maybe even try pushing a firmware update to it. Does anyone have any super easy instructions on this? 🙂 or perhaps something else that is useful when dealing with the Meraki API and Postman? I think it is a skill that would be super beneficial later down the road...
... View more
Nov 24 2021
7:37 AM
Is there any way I can investigate and or dig deeper into what might be causing the slow network performance? What I mean is, I changed some settings on the mx64 firewall, and basically I eliminated the network concerning my security cameras. What I noticed was when I pulled a webpage, that it loaded faster. So just wondering if there is some documents pertaining to increasing network performance for the mx64 especially since it is serving the DHCP for the various vlans.
... View more
Nov 24 2021
4:41 AM
Thanks! So MX it is, but what about performance?! Would I get more or less options using dhcp on the switch? Also what about portfast on the switch? I didn’t see it listed. I’m not trying to rabbit trail here but trying to put it in the place for best performance and convergence considering all things like STP…
... View more
Nov 23 2021
6:34 PM
Hello, Recommended DHCP server should reside where? It’s a small network with just 1 MX, 1 MS, and 1 MR. Thanks!
... View more
Thanks the problem was I had mapped my port to the wrong vlan.
... View more
No NAT on the netgear device. It looks pretty straightforward you just put the netgear into AP mode, and it asks if you want to assign and ip address or get one dynamically. I assigned it one specifically, and then turned off for it to serve DHCP addresses. The netgear in AP mode also lets you configure the wifi settings, SSID, password, etc. But for some reason or another, it is working but instead of pulling a 10.10.11.x ip address on a laptop or cell phone with wifi, it pulls a 10.10.9.x address which that is supposed to be for only hardwired addresses...
... View more
While sitting with a 10.10.9.2 ip address... I can ping the 10.10.11.1 and get a response, but can't get a response for the 10.10.11.2, however I can access the 10.10.11.2 by getting a login page, and just to confirm although the netgear is in AP mode, the DHCP server is turned off on the netgear, as I thought it might be better performance to let the firewall handle the DHCP instead of the netgear ap?
... View more
The good news is I am starting to see devices that pull the 10.10.x.x network but the problem is the wifi hosts should be pulling a 10.10.11.x address. So for some reason or another it is pulling ip addresses from the 10.10.9.x network for the wifi clients... perhaps I've got to add some static routes ?
... View more
multiple leads? none, if I am understanding your question correctly.
... View more
I set net gear as static, and the firmware version is 15.44 ill try rebooting, thank you
... View more
© 2025 Cisco Systems, Inc.
