Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About dade80vr
dade80vr
Getting noticed
Member since Dec 1, 2020
May 4 2023
Community Record
31
Posts
4
Kudos
1
Solution
Badges
Mar 22 2023
5:45 AM
Disable "web cache" in SD WAN & Traffic Shaping and reboot MX will solve the problem as a work around.
... View more
Mar 10 2023
1:17 AM
3 case in these days after MX upgrade: a lot of websites won't load despite not being blacklisted! Rollback done to v17.10.2 and problem solved Please Meraki don't force to any stable RC release!!!
... View more
Mar 10 2023
1:12 AM
Hi, same here! Rollback done to 17.10.2. Meraki please do not force upgrade to any "Stable RC" versions!
... View more
May 3 2022
3:26 AM
2 Kudos
solved on webabi by adding query params tags[] still having problems on Postman, it seems to ignore the filter
... View more
May 3 2022
3:05 AM
Hi. I'm stuck on a simple tag filter in webapi: i get a bad request with error: "errors": [ "'tags' must be an array" ] https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-latest/#!get-organization-networks How can i filter networks with specified tag? Thank you.
... View more
Apr 29 2022
1:53 AM
1 Kudo
Same here, still having problems!
... View more
Apr 11 2022
11:19 PM
Something is changed in dashboard? NBAR events can no longer be selected
... View more
Apr 2 2022
9:08 AM
Sure? This customer does not have an AnyConnect license and does not use it. Summary reports says that device utilization is under 20% in the last week and CPU data are insufficient. Still having uplink down/up for 20 seconds: I'm just thinking the problem is related to STP , I could remove the closed loop cable on switch for some days.
... View more
Mar 28 2022
11:53 PM
Hi, we are using this Powershell script. Try to arrange as your needs. The script could be automated via Windows Server GPO as startup computer script. Bye.
... View more
Mar 28 2022
11:37 PM
Access - Untagged VLAN1 management on both sides
... View more
Mar 28 2022
11:13 PM
Nice idea, let me check.
... View more
Mar 28 2022
11:13 PM
It could be.. but on 2 different port? Port3 and port4?
... View more
Mar 28 2022
7:31 AM
We are using Fully Redundant (Multiple Switches) design: https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Deployment_Guides/MX_Warm_Spare_-_High_Availability_Pair The crossover VRRP link is made by switches, not by MXs This is a piece of log:
... View more
Mar 28 2022
6:35 AM
1 Kudo
Hi , we have got a customer with a simple network redundant WAN design: 2 router 2 MX85 (master and slave) with shared public ip Routers are connected to MX WANs: R1 to MX1 WAN1 R1 to MX2 WAN1 R2 to MX1 WAN2 R2 to MX2 WAN2 We got a lot of logs regarding primary uplink status change and ethernet port carrier change (on WANs port 3/4). WAN1 is set as primary WAN, WAN2 is set as failover. primary uplink status change events: about 20s from WAN2 to WAN1 (WAN1 fails to WAN2 and back) ethernet port carrier change events: 1s from false to true No fails are detected on main routers. What is happening? How can i understand this situation? This KB is clear: https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Monitoring_and_Reporting/Primary_Uplink_Status_and_Ethernet_Port_Carrier_Change_Events RSTP is enabled on both routers and downstream switches. Additional note: the VRRP crossover cable is made by 2 downstream switches in Fully Redundant design: https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Deployment_Guides/MX_Warm_Spare_-_High_Availability_Pair Thanks for help.
... View more
Mar 22 2022
12:35 AM
Still having problems with Traffic analysis DISABLED and L7 "gaming" activated! DNS requests are categorized as "XBOX LIVE" 🙄 It's urgent! NBAR still blocking wrong services..
... View more
Mar 22 2022
12:26 AM
It works, many thanks
... View more
Mar 17 2022
6:30 AM
Same things here. Blocked DNS requests as "XBOX Live" 😞 Disabled NBAR in Traffic analysis but i would like to maintain it to "detailed" and "all gaming" L7 rules! Please fix!
... View more
Feb 11 2022
1:17 AM
Same here. From 5.7.8 to 5.7.9. Keep app up to date is checked. ??
... View more
Feb 11 2022
12:10 AM
Hi. Is there a way to deploy TM Worry Free Security Agent on Android >8 ? Has anyone tried? TM dashboard only allows to send a mail with (or copy) a deployment url. Thank you, bye.
... View more
Jan 18 2021
2:43 AM
@PhilipDAth wrote: >could be a NPS server inside my network and not public exposed or must be public? If you are using that method it has to run over the Internet. You can NAT through udp/1812 to your RADIUS server. Already did, let me do other tests tomorrow. In your opinion i must insert PUBLIC or private IP address on Radius Server host in Access Control page ? Thank you all guys.
... View more
Jan 15 2021
5:56 AM
@GreenMan wrote: If splash page is your particular ask, then this will apply: https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Cross-Platform_Content/Splash_Page#MX_Splash_Page_Options Yes, i know. Splash page depends from access control page: if i set Network access > Sign on with "my radius server" i can setup a Radius IP. But the main questions is: could be a NPS server inside my network and not public exposed or must be public? If i do a port forward of 1812/UDP from Meraki Cloud IPs to the NPS private IP, it works? That page says that: IP addresses The Meraki cloud must be able to communicate with your RADIUS servers via the Internet.
Please make sure that:
Your RADIUS servers have public IP addresses (i.e., they are reachable on the Internet).
Your firewall, if any, allows incoming traffic to your RADIUS servers.
You whitelist IP addresses as clients on your RADIUS server as per the firewall information page. @GreenMan wrote: I see you found that already, in Dashboard - and that the multi-client recommendation puts it out for you (😕). It's worth knowing that the authorisation, on that basis - if you did adopt it - is an on/off switch. Assuming the VLANs on your site are all routed by your MX, by default authenticated clients would be able to access all those. You could limit any access between them (and to the Internet, of course) using the MX Firewall features. Note that, if you're also using VPN, you would need to control any access to remote subnets over VPN tunnels separately, using VPN firewall rules under Security & SD-WAN > Configure > Site-to-site VPN Right
... View more
Jan 15 2021
5:32 AM
The 802.1X configurations on all Security Appliances are designed for a single-host authentication. Connecting multiple devices on the same port is not recommended. No, this is not what i am looking for.
... View more
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1562 | Dec 1 2020 3:19 AM |
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1382 | |
| 1 | 18110 | |
| 1 | 2537 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
