Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About rarodrigo
Community Record
29
Posts
10
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Sep 2 2020
1:28 PM
1 Kudo
Olá @FelipePerrone, Eu também fiz desta forma e verifiquei que foram adicionados alguns dominios. Porém, tentei fazer algumas consolidações com o que a Microsoft informa, e me parece que tem alguns servidores que talvez estejam em redes distintas ou dominios populados que de fato podem não ser capturados. O que tentei comparar foi através dessa info da MS ( https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/enterprise/urls-and-ip-address-ranges?view=o365-worldwide#skype-for-business-online-and-microsoft-teams ) Mas valeu pelo feedback, acredito que esta na mesma linha que tenho aqui.
... View more
Sep 2 2020
9:37 AM
Olá Pessoal, Gostaria de avaliar com vocês em relação a uma validação de uma aplicação específica dentro do O365 utilizando os recursos do Insight. Pelo entedimento podemos adicionar " Custom Application ", porém existe apenas a possibilidade de inserção de um único endereço ( URL ) e não aceita utilização de mascara ( * ). Isso ocorre, pois existe a necessidade de fazer um " split " dentro do O365 especificamente para o MS Teams. Dentro do contexto essa aplicação ainda não consta separada como o Skype. Vocês imaginam alguma outra opção ou como observar nos " Treshold " somente a necessidade para o MS Teams?
... View more
Labels:
Sep 2 2020
9:17 AM
Hello All, I am looking about verify a custom application to insert in " Web Health " based specific for MS Teams. We already had Office 365 application, but in this case I would like to show MS Teams specifically. Then, if apply custom application we have only URL name to insert on the field and looks like cannot use mask ( like * ). Is there any another idea to insert more URL for this custom application or is there any another way to verify only MS Teams?
... View more
Aug 18 2020
11:50 AM
Good or Not. ( rs ). So, the better option to make wish and wait a better solution. In parallel work via script.
... View more
Aug 18 2020
7:43 AM
I would like to know if are missing something about group policies based on time schedule function that have. The idea to create same rules to apply in different times, like to allow some application on the lunch time and the same schedule needs to be applied on the night. So, what the best way to apply the same rules in different time schedule because I can see in dashboard that cannot split this time.
... View more
Feb 12 2020
5:07 AM
Hi, It's correct. It's work as expected, however after figure out and investigate with Umbrella team, this status can take 24 hours to put as " Online " after traffic match with your policy.
... View more
Feb 12 2020
5:04 AM
Hi, I appreciate your answer and I have now a lots of posts based in this solution and expalining those points. ( https://ciscoredes.com.br/tag/umbrella/ ).
... View more
Sep 30 2019
12:53 PM
I made it and working fine. Fine, that I can see inside of police, but never goes to " Active ". It's weird.
... View more
Sep 30 2019
11:43 AM
@kYutobi I am doing some tests with Umbrella ( API ) using free trial and I can verify when are created inside " Group Policy " the police in Umbrella dashboard never goes to " Active ". However, if I created integration inside " SSID " I can see policy going " Active ". Did you face something near of it?
... View more
Sep 30 2019
11:29 AM
Hello Community, I am doing some tests with Meraki and Umbrella integration, however I can see some problems and I am not sure if someone has any experience about it. I can confirm when link integration id done via " SSID " the policy can goes " Online ", however if I create a group policy to attached this police of Umbrella I never can put as " Online ". For this situation I follow this documentation ( https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/Other_Topics/Integrating_Cisco_Umbrella_with_Meraki_Networks ), but I didn't figure out what's my issue to put those policies as "Online". Did you someone make this experience?
... View more
Apr 24 2019
6:20 AM
I have some doubts about AnyConnect in order to make connection via Client. Nowadays I already have VPN Client configured to use Android devices ( as test ), however I would like to use via AnyConnect for desktop user. My doubts, the configuration about those Clients are the same place we have in Security -> VPN Client? Is there another capability to verify?
... View more
Feb 1 2019
9:44 AM
I don't have more this log in my system and keep using " AMP ". I am running inside 14.38 and keep stable without replicating the message.
... View more
Dec 4 2018
3:48 AM
@Charlie In my case I keep using " AMP " as enable and looking the same error on the event log. I verified those guys mentioned about version 14.31, however this version for my case is not available and have only 13.36 ( stable release ) and 14.36 ( latest beta ). However I can verify release information about version 14.31, but keep without any information about fix issue. Weird!!! I will do upgrade of only one box and verify environment.
... View more
Sep 3 2018
7:14 AM
6 Kudos
Olá Pessoal, Sou Rodrigo Rovere e atualmente trabalho na British Telecom onde a empresa suporta como produto as soluções de Meraki ( UTM, SDWAN, LAN Access ). Sou participante dessa comunidade e agora acredito que temos nosso espaço em Português. Também divulgo bastante conteúdo Meraki em meu BLOG ( www.ciscoredes.com.br/tag/meraki ) para ajudar nossa comunidade em Português. Sucesso para nós todos. 🙂
... View more
Jun 5 2018
8:36 AM
I am using the same version 13.28 and selected as Prevention/Security. For me it's weird message, because maybe rules are not in place.
... View more
Jun 5 2018
6:51 AM
1 Kudo
Hello Everyone, I have some doubts about this error based in intrusion detection, because all the time the logs keep the same. My concern is related with message based in " Unable start sniffer ", however on the same time you can verify rules started. So, why receiving error putting with unable start sniffer based specific rules and keep starting same rules based in updates?
... View more
Apr 20 2018
11:33 AM
Hello everyone, Do you know if those information will be executed as previous, may be in April. I am concerning about it because on the quartely call nobody metion about this feature.
... View more
Apr 17 2018
10:55 AM
Hello All, I had deployment of this feature and now I doing testing based in VPN Client and for me it's working looking at Android plataform, however maybe there is timeout of the VPN. After specific time VPN closed and I need to execute again the connection. I tried to figure out something about timeout of session but didn't find anything. Do you know there is something in this way?
... View more
Feb 20 2018
9:30 AM
1 Kudo
Exactly. My point view should be have any function to enable on portal for example if I can enable level session of logs ( like Cisco ) in order to see more logs in some events. Like level 7 - debugging, level 3 - information, so similar in this way. I believe will do " Make wish " 🙂
... View more
Feb 20 2018
5:01 AM
Hello @Adam I appreciate your answer, however I know about this feature in Meraki dashboard, however I would like to know if have any another resource inside of "Cloud - Meraki Dashboard" without any Syslog Server installation for the customer. I meaning without this feature enable if some customer could capture another logs before 3 months or more detail.
... View more
Feb 19 2018
11:33 AM
Hello Team, I verified and have some doubts about logs inside of Dashboard or mention inside Organization that we working on the dashboard. It about event log I can see we have in real time ( logs ) based in 3 months, as well as can make download of all logs to verify something. My doubts are related detail logs because sometimes we don't have detail of logs as well as for example if I need to get logs before of 3 months, so how I can do? Is better to raise a ticket with support team? Someone has any experience on it?
... View more
Feb 16 2018
9:26 AM
@Adam and @Uberseehandel I believe understood logic about cache related device when you make power schedule in uplink ( connection between switches ). It about your last mention when is related AP which is controlled because switch ( uplink or trunk port ) will manage. But according discussion about WOL I am on the same page, and could be good point to verify.
... View more
Feb 15 2018
10:10 AM
@Adam Sorry for my wrong mention ( uplink ) used to Switch Cisco ( all as trunks ). But there is no option to use port schedule in uplink, so for me some case could be good idea. As below, the port of AP has option, but I cannot use same policies in uplink port.
... View more
Feb 15 2018
3:46 AM
I made this setup on switch in order to power off ports to AP and Phones but I cannot scheduled a power off on the trunk port, which in same cases could be good way. Is there any idea why I cannot power schedule on the trunk port?
... View more
Feb 15 2018
3:01 AM
I only to advise another problems facing to block this traffic. 1) I cannot use a mask ( like * ) to implement rules inside of Layer 7 FW, so only entire and exactly URL to match which will increase more line in my rules 2) I didn't find way to specific a message regarding this rules when I have match on it ( like hits ) on the line and the same time a message could be informed as default for the user ( when user access by browser saying, maybe " This is not permitted in this environment " ) The only way to block this traffic was defined rules inside of MX ( Outbound Rules - Layer 3 ) on the specific VLAN using only a mask on the begin of URL ( *.whatsapp ), again cannot use a mask ( like * ) on the finish of this address. Then, I will make wish on the portal in order to ask more attention.
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 57876 | |
| 1 | 3508 | |
| 1 | 11843 | |
| 1 | 4148 | |
| 1 | 124780 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
