About JimTolson

JimTolson · ‎09-04-2021

I'll accept this as the answer for now, at the very least it's nice to know someone else is seeing the same behaviour. For anyone else that ends up on this thread, I also tried adding a flow preference, but at the end of the day its just a preference, it's overridden by the failover also, maybe a "forced" tick box would be nice on the flow preference rows.

JimTolson · ‎09-01-2021

We have several MX firewalls setup with 2 4G WAN routers. If like in the screenshot below, WAN 1 looses internet and the port goes into a failed state, the MX fails over to WAN 2 as it should, but fails to route traffic to 10.1.1.2 out WAN 1, it sends it out WAN 2. I feel the WAN 1 and WAN 2 subnets should be present in the routing table and still apply even if a WAN port goes into a failed state. Does anyone have a workaround for the bellow situation, as we are using SD WAN we can still remote control PC's on site, and can get to the web interface of WAN 2's 10.1.2.1. but packet captures on WAN 1 and WAN 2 show attempts to connect to 10.1.1.2 are going out WAN port 2, which doesn't make sense.

JimTolson · ‎06-09-2020

Same here. Meraki switch and wireless management "view failed to load"

JimTolson · ‎12-10-2019

Topology History would be nice. even if it only showed the last 1 or 2 topology changes for a given network and the date time they changed.

JimTolson · ‎08-15-2019

I too am missing the Radius Accounting and Radius Proxy settings. will raise a ticket with support.

JimTolson

Community Record

Badges

Re: Accessing a modem on a failed WAN port in a dual WAN scenario

Accessing a modem on a failed WAN port in a dual WAN scenario

Re: Switch Management page not loading

Re: A Guest Community Challenge!

Re: 'Radius Accounting' is not seen in Access Control

Re: Switch Management page not loading

Re: A Guest Community Challenge!