Community Record
23
Posts
9
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Aug 27 2020
7:50 AM
Our dashboard has just come back online for web & mobile (Ireland)
... View more
Aug 25 2020
1:57 AM
Hi all, Does anyone have a definitive answer on why the Meraki Firewall rules does not end in a Deny All Rule, as is considered to be best practice when setting up firewall rules in general? As I understand it, currently if none of your firewall rules match incoming traffic, the Allow All rule will allow all traffic in. Any insight will be appreciated. Thanks.
... View more
Jul 24 2020
2:29 AM
Hi there, HQ is behind ASA and Core Switch and in Passthrough mode, is this incorrect? Should I change it? Yes the Core Switch knows the routing to the subnets Thx
... View more
Jul 23 2020
1:22 PM
Hi all, hope somebody can help me out or point me in the right direction with this one. This is my setup: HQ - MX behind an ASA Branch - MX with AutoVPN to HQ with DSL connection HQ is on a 10.32.0.x subnet with a static IP in that range, gateway is set to the core switch IP Branch is on a 10.32.18.x subnet with a route on the ASA to allow reaching the network beyond the HQ MX Everything works as expected with the VPN,from the branch we can reach any 10.32.x .x subnet as well as subnets in the range 172.30.x.x. coming from the ASA Now it becomes murky, currently because we have the Default route ticked in Site-to-Site VPN, all our traffic goes over the VPN, we need to change this behaviour to ensure only advertised subnets go over the VPN and all internet traffic breaks out locally. I know that by unticking the Default Route, I will get local internet breakout for non-vpn traffic, but this means that I can only reach the 10.32.x.x subnets and crucially not the 172.32.x.x subnets. I tried adding another VLAN in the 172 subnet but it didn't work because the MX doesn't know how to route this vlan, I also tried adding a static route but this also failed. So now I'm stumped. It might well be that my inputs in vlans/static were wrong, any help would be greatly appreciated. Feel free to ask for more details.
... View more
Aug 23 2019
3:03 AM
3 Kudos
Hi Julian, There where two things which support helped me with, I had to make sure my custom APN was correct and then I had to ensure that the new config had sync'ed before I pulled the lan cable, after that it worked on LTE after a reboot.
... View more
Aug 21 2019
3:26 PM
Hi, I have setup a MX68W in my HQ and want to deploy a MX68CW with LTE as the primary WAN uplink on a remote site using AutoVPN. When testing at HQ the LTE as primary works fine as does the AutoVPN, until I reboot the device, then the device doesn't connect again to the cloud, until I connect a LAN cable, after the Meraki connects I can disconnect the LAN cable and work on LTE again. Is this by design? My remote site does not have access to a LAN, hence the need for LTE only. Any help/advice appertained.
... View more
May 31 2019
3:46 PM
3 Kudos
Hi all, A bit about yourself & your work I work for a Cisco Partner Paradyn in Ireland Your experience with Cisco Meraki I'm just starting out learning Cisco Meraki A fun fact about yourself I am originally from South Africa
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
Subject | Kudos | Views |
---|---|---|
3 | 7075 | |
3 | 114116 |