Wireless users are in the same vlan as wired users? ... View more

No, you could work something out using a scheduled api call.   But it would be better to fix the issue, maybe firmware related?   What firmware version are you running? ... View more

Yes. If you want to use the native switch port vlan (1).  ... View more

Like @Mloraditch says. Dont set to vlan1. Use vlan tagging: disabled   else you get tagged vlan 1 traffic instead of native vlan traffic.   ... View more

MS switches can dynamically assign a VLAN to a client device by configuring the switch port to use the VLAN ID received via the RADIUS attribute Tunnel-Pvt-Group-ID   https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-server-2008-R2-and-2008/cc772124(v=ws.10)?redirectedfrom=MSDN   https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Access_Control/MS_Switch_Access_Policies_(802.1X)#Dynamic_VLAN_Assignment ... View more

Which model switch? ... View more

What sfp are you using? Did you set pppoe on the local status page? ... View more

I think wifi works. But it Looks like a dhcp server or client issue now. ... View more

Network wide > event log > for access points And Wireless > health > select ssid for printer   Ssid settings:   ... View more

Did you check the logging for errors? Could you try without 802.11 w/r Could you try without band steering ... View more

After you apply a fw rule, you need to make sure the flow (stop the ping) is not active for 10 minutes.    On the live tools you can see start live fw logging to see what rule(s) it hit.  So start log > then start ping ... View more

How it the trunk configured on the 9300 port and on the upstream switch port?   Where is the dhcp server connected and on which vlan   Where is the client connected and on which vlan ... View more

It somehow detects 172.16.252.19 as packet on the lan side.  You have a config with static routes? Dynamic routing? Or just vlans?   172.16.252.19 is a ip from a spoke? You could try running a pakket capture of the lan side mx with filter "host 172.16.252.19" ... View more

Every wan interface needs to be able to talk to the meraki services/ internet  You basically need something like this design https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Site-to-site_VPN/Configuring_Site-to-site_VPN_over_MPLS ... View more

Are you try ing to mix them in co term?   Q: Can I mix MR Enterprise and MR Advanced licenses in a co-term organization?    A: No, all MR licenses must have the same edition (MR Enterprise or MR Advanced) across a co-term organization. You can use MR Upgrade licenses to convert your existing MR Enterprise licenses into MR Advanced licenses and convert your organization’s Product Edition from MR Enterprise to MR Advanced.   https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Licensing/Meraki_MR_License_Guide#Co-term_Licensing_Model_FAQ ... View more

I supose that is incoming traffic? Because warm spares dont support ipv6 so they dont reply to any ipv6 traffic   ... View more

Hmm that would be new, i dont see it over here, only for the ipv6   Can you check if this early access is enabled? NAT Exceptions with Manual Inbound Firewall ... View more

You can't , must be same model.   "Note: The spare MX must be the same MX model as the primary. Warm spare functionality is not supported between different MX models" https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Deployment_Guides/MX_Warm_Spare_-_High_Availability_Pair ... View more

The deny all should be only for ipv6.   Unless you running a early access: NAT Exceptions with Manual Inbound Firewall   ... View more

If you mean med, no ... View more

I dont even  get the graph/circle anymore ... View more

.100 is not part of that /26 subnet   You would need to set it to  /24 from a /22 subnet pool.   But you mg will probably end up using 192.168.0.0/24 in that case, because you cant choose it. https://documentation.meraki.com/MG/MG_Best_Practices/MG_Wireless_WAN_Dashboard_Settings   You could try making a meraki support case and ask if they are able to assign/force it   ... View more