Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About Kave
Kave
Getting noticed
Member since Dec 11, 2018
Feb 7 2024
Kav noroozi
Community Record
59
Posts
5
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Apr 13 2023
8:28 AM
HI, I got alot of Alert from Meraki as well, Looks like the DNS is belong to Microsoft but i am still searching. after tracert the last hope was: a23-211-116-171.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [23.211.116.171]
... View more
Apr 4 2023
5:37 PM
HI, Meraki Tec suggestion was using Unique Identifier
... View more
Apr 3 2023
7:11 PM
HTTPS Issue has ben solved on L3 Switch and MX -firmware issu on 17 x Ver or higher We are using MX105 and MS 250. had issue with firmware upgrade when upgrade from 16 x to 17 x or higher ver. problem was HTTPS traffic got slow even with good bandwidth . Please use Unique Client Identifier instead MAC addres as shown on screen shot. you can find it in Security & SD-WAN --> Addressing&VLANs
... View more
Apr 3 2023
7:10 PM
We are using MX105 and MS 250. had issue with firmware upgrade when upgrade from 16 x to 17 x or higher ver. problem was HTTPS traffic got slow even with good bandwidth . to fix this issue Please use Unique Client Identifier instead MAC addres as shown on screen shot. you can find it in Security & SD-WAN --> Addressing&VLANs
... View more
Apr 3 2023
7:09 PM
Solved issue 🙂 We are using MX105 and MS 250. had issue with firmware upgrade when upgrade from 16 x to 17 x or higher ver. problem was HTTPS traffic got slow even with good bandwidth . Please use Unique Client Identifier instead MAC addres as shown on screen shot. you can find it in Security & SD-WAN --> Addressing&VLANs
... View more
Apr 3 2023
7:08 PM
We are using MX105 and MS 250. had issue with firmware upgrade when upgrade from 16 x to 17 x or higher ver. problem was HTTPS traffic got slow even with good bandwidth . Please use Unique Client Identifier instead MAC address as shown on screen shot. you can find it in Security & SD-WAN --> Addressing&VLANs We are using MX105 and MS 250. had issue with firmware upgrade when upgrade from 16 x to 17 x or higher ver. problem was HTTPS traffic got slow even with good bandwidth . Please use Unique Client Identifier instead MAC addres as shown on screen shot. you can find it in Security & SD-WAN --> Addressing&VLANs
... View more
We are using MX105 and MS 250. had issue with firmware upgrade when upgrade from 16 x to 17 x or higher ver. problem was HTTPS traffic got slow even with good bandwidth . Please use Unique Client Identifier instead MAC addres as shown on screen shot. you can find it in Security & SD-WAN --> Addressing&VLANs
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Layer 3
Mar 27 2022
10:59 PM
Hi, but i need to have access to some Chinese websites, what should i do?
... View more
Sep 15 2020
5:17 PM
It is brand new network i made it with L3 switches. before was like All L2 switches going to DC via 1 Gb fibre and connected to another L2 and then via That L2 in DC connected to same MX, but we have no issue at that time. then we changed it to 10 Gb connectin between 2x L3 switches in dc and campus and problem comes up, as i mentioned for now after change the DNS and also some more work on Client PC seems ok but still some users having issue somtimes. first page loading so slow or sometimes get error loading page. internet bandwidth is about 200Mb/s- but we are using this bandwidth for MX's auto VPN of other branches come to this MX from another site as well.
... View more
Sep 15 2020
5:11 PM
Thank you for your reply. we have another MX's for another branches with same content filtering but no issue at all
... View more
Sep 15 2020
5:10 PM
Hi Philip. Thank you for your response. speed test show me 180 Mb/s- users about 100 users incluse smartphones but not all of them browsing at same time 🙂 i used Quad 9 - 9.9.9.9 which nsllokup was a bit slow(180 ms, i changed it to open DNS about 18 ms it is getting faster but still having an issue, i try to do flush DNS and netsh winsock reset on the computers. it looks ok but i am worry if any problem in my design was happend somewhere.
... View more
Sep 6 2020
4:19 PM
Hi everyone. I have difficulty for slowing http trafic, everything is ok in my network but just open webpage is so slow. Please check Network layout and let me know where i had mistake maybe. webcache on MX is enable. all SVI set on Core switch and routed back from MX to Core switch and L3 to campus with VLAN 100
... View more
Jul 20 2020
6:25 PM
Thank you for your responce. i just would like to make VLAN pruning and i made Transit VLAN as x.x100.0/24 for all L3 switches and MX as well as you can see. you talked about second transit VLAN, how it works i don't know about it? Default route for MS 410 would be x.x.100 which is MS 425 Also need i make a static route on MX for ALL VLAN and make 1 static and default route for MS 425 to MX? like i will make VLAN 100 on MX with x.x100.1 and On L3 x.x100.100 and the default route for MS425 would be x.x100.1 which is MX.
... View more
Jul 19 2020
8:59 PM
Hi everyone. I have 2x L3 switches, 1x MS410, and 1x MS425. they are connected as the diagram is shown. I have some servers and storages connected to the MS 425. and i will use it as a core switch. in MS 410 I have L2 switches connected directly via fiber. then MS 410 connected directly via 10 Gb fiber connection to MS 425. I have some VLAN for End users and some VLAN for servers and other resources. I would like to know which one is better to do. 1. Using 2 diffrent SVI, make users VLAN on MS410 +DHCP server for those subnet and route them to MS 425 via default route and Make the rest of VLAN on MS425? First diagram. 2. Using just 1 SVI,make all VLAN + DHCP server for all subnet on MS 425 and avoid second hope for MS 410, second diagram.
... View more
Jul 19 2020
8:49 PM
Thank Philip for your response, but I wondering any way to take control of VPN client IP?
... View more
Jul 18 2020
7:14 PM
Because we have many different Servers/Resources and remote users need to connect to a specific different server, i need to filter them via IP in ACL, at the moment because we have no control of VPN Client subnet, we can not do it. VPN client IP Like a DHCP server with no option. because the user pulling IP from VPN client DHCP, the user has different IP when they connected to VPN and next time it gets changed, so I can not make ACL based of IP.
... View more
Jul 18 2020
2:59 PM
thanks for your support Maybe my bad, my question is how control IP That VPN client do not give me Option to contol it. The problem still there because if i assign an IP to the user via policy i can't control VPN client subnet to avoid assign Same IP to another machine VIA auto DHCP in VPN client.
... View more
Jul 14 2020
3:20 PM
I have an edge MX is connected directly to MS 425 and All my Server farm connected to MS425. VPN client using 172.16.100.0/24 subnet and all remote users have access to all server's traffic via this subnet. Now i decided to control some remote users to not going everywhere but how? I have no ACL in VPN client Also I have no option to make static VPN client IP for users, looks like VPN client in MX just makes DHCP without any option?!!!
... View more
Jun 25 2020
10:08 PM
Hi everyone. Is there any way to force a specific machine ( Via MAC address) to use Specific SSID. I have 3 different SSID in my MR WAP and i need just 1 SSID automatically connected to specific MAC.
... View more
Jun 25 2020
9:55 PM
Hi everyone. Is there any way to force a specific machine ( Via MAC address) to use Specific SSID. I have 3 different SSID in my MR WAP and i need just 1 SSID automatically connected to specific MAC.
... View more
Jun 25 2020
9:51 PM
1 Kudo
Yes, it was big mistake, hopefully my Nice Manager fixed it with Meraki and we are going to change it. 🙂
... View more
Jun 24 2020
9:42 PM
Thank you for your reply, Everything was ok, it was my mistake to choose MS 410 as 16x 10Gb port, i have to choose MS 425
... View more
Jun 24 2020
9:41 PM
My misordering, it is working well, my mistake was select the wrong switch, i need 16 x 10 Gb port and i have to choose MS 425.
... View more
Jun 24 2020
5:23 PM
I made a 10Gb link between 2 x Ms410 via SFP+ but in the dashboard shows me it is 1 Gb link. i checked with 2 different SFP + brand and cisco compatible.
... View more
I need to separate Meraki admin and limited access for IT technicians. for example, i need to give access to IT members for access to the switch port but not configuration, i had check Meraki's help but did not much help me how to do that.
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3846 | |
| 2 | 5205 | |
| 1 | 2548 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
