Community Record
138
Posts
6
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
May 15 2023
12:47 AM
@alex_n thanks for responding and the information! maybe you know what version(s) are affected from this bug and if it`s noted in the release nodes as bug?
... View more
May 11 2023
7:32 AM
Hi, it would be interessting if this issue is still up to date and if somebody could give an update on this! We´re facing that problem as well but only with some ISPs...
... View more
Dec 22 2022
11:49 PM
regarding the documentation the check happens all 4-6 hours so it‘s hard to capture… is there a way to trigger it?
... View more
Dec 22 2022
2:33 AM
thanks for your response! I thought that too but when I read through this documentation - at the bottom of the page - my understanding is that it would be routed through the VPN… https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Networks_and_Routing/MX_Routing_Behavior
... View more
Dec 22 2022
12:52 AM
Hi all, in the Dashboard, I can see this notficiation "Our automated tests show that you have one or more Meraki devices unable to reach our plaform on IP address ranges 216.157.128.0/20 and 158.115.128.0/19." https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Other_Topics/Cloud_Maintenance_New_IP_Ranges_2022_FAQ In my setup I´m using Auto-VPN and the Default-Route is announced/used via the Tunnel to my Hub! Unfortunately I can`t see the source IP-Address in the FIrewall-Test-Failures.csv report which is used from the MX to the Cloud?! I´ve quite a lot of VLANs configured on the MX (SVI) and I think I´ve heard that the highest one will be used for the Management Traffic, is this correct? Maybe someone can point me to a documentation which explaines the behaviour? thanks a lot!
... View more
Oct 26 2022
12:30 PM
hi, i‘m currently facing the same problem between a meraki MS425 and an Aruba VSF stack… every basic settings is correct but one link does‘nt work! @TheBR did you found a solution for the issue already?
... View more
Jun 10 2022
6:30 AM
Hi, are there any suggestions on which %level the limit should be configured? I´ve been gone through the official documentation which also states: "...Suppression monitors the bandwidth of each individual switch port every 1 second. On classic MS switches, if the specified type of traffic exceeds the defined limit, only excess packets will be dropped." are there (interface) statistics or Logging entries that will show those kind of drops?
... View more
May 17 2022
9:55 PM
OK - but will there be an interruption for the productive enviroment? I´ve to say that this ports are used as uplinks for the meraki equipment (internet access) too... 😞
... View more
May 17 2022
11:28 AM
Hi all, I´ve an urgent question regarding your experiences with the following scenario... I noticed that 2 switch ports on the meraki switch are on the opposite side configured for a LACP LAG - the correct configuration should be a LAG but how should I fix that? regarding the official documentation the links should be connected after the Aggregation has been configured in dashboard, but that`s unfortunatley now not possible anymore?! maybe someone has an experience and can tell me if it can also work with active ports? thanks for any response
... View more
Apr 26 2022
11:25 AM
is this answer still valid and that kind of setup is also not working with MS425?
... View more
Mar 21 2022
10:51 AM
does Vlan1 need to be untagged (= native) on the trunk links? It is important to note however that as Rapid-PVST is a multi-VLAN spanning tree protocol, MS series switches can participate in spanning tree only when a spanning tree instance is running on VLAN 1 of all switches. In addition, VLAN 1 must be allowed on all trunk ports running Rapid-PVST, so that BPDUs are seen by the Meraki switches in the topology. how will the meraki switches behave when there are different native vlans on trunk links?
... View more
Mar 1 2022
1:02 AM
2 Kudos
it's an older topic but for the sake of completeness... please have a look under --> Network-wide/General/Device configuration I guess this is the setting you´re looking for!
... View more
Feb 21 2022
11:22 AM
hi all, i‘m working on a topic which drives me crazy 😞 if anybody would have told me in advance that‘s so damn hard to implement a local polling SNMP solution i probably would‘nt believed it! i‘d like to use a 3rd party SNMP grapher which should discover every second the bandwidth utilization of a MS 10G interface… for a reason which i don‘t understand the tool shows only every 30sec the performance of the interface?! maybe someone can help me understand why this is happening?
... View more
Jan 31 2022
8:24 AM
OK, when disabling RSTP on the Ports would it make sense to use BPDU-Guard and/or Port-Security to get a rough Layer2 Security to avoid potential issues?
... View more
Jan 30 2022
11:42 AM
@KarstenI wrote: There will be no separation. With "only" running RSTP and no "per VLAN", the main trunk has to transport the whole traffic or you will run into STP-problems. regarding to this I´ve to add another sketch I`m concerned here with the respective yellow markings! The goal which I´d like to achive is a separation of the VLAN-Database on Site A and Site B so they would allow the same VLAN-IDs used on each of the sites but don`t affect each other!
... View more
Jan 30 2022
11:18 AM
hi @KarstenI … not sure if you‘d lead a course about cisco ftd which i joined last year online?! 🙂 maybe you can also give me an advice about the disabling of stp on the ports which will connect on both ms switches so only a routed connection will exist and allow a separation of layer2 vlan domains?
... View more
Jan 29 2022
4:27 AM
Hi guys, since you can't use routed (no switchport) interfaces with the MS-switches, but only SVI's, I`d be interested on the attached setup and like to get your opinion for that! What do you think of using the MS switch in addition to the Layer3 function at the same time to connect the 2nd MS-switch physically and in the same VLAN? I`d like to achive an ECMP routing which should be possible with that - correct?!
... View more
Jan 28 2022
12:54 AM
Hi, I´d like to ask a question regarding to this! Is there anyhting else what should be considered when using this? e.g. BPDU-Filter or BPDU-Guard on the used ports on each side or other STP related topics to avoid possible Loops? Is this also a Meraki suggested solution with official documentation?
... View more
Jan 3 2022
11:42 AM
Hi, I´m currently also dealing with this topic and, for the sake of completeness, would just like to give a short update in this thread! Finally, in addition to the above configurable priorities, there is an additional low-latency queue priority which is not user configurable. This queue has a greater priority than all other queues and as such is serviced before all other queues. Only packets with a DSCP value of 46 (EF - Expedited Forwarding, Voice) are placed into this queue. This feature is available and enabled on all MX14+ networks. https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Firewall_and_Traffic_Shaping/Using_Packet_Prioritization_on_a_Traffic_Shaping_Rule The only question for me is regarding the red marked part does anyone know how large this queue is or if/what parameter is used for policing that traffic?
... View more
Dec 19 2021
10:47 AM
the “problem“ is, that the customer uses vlan-id‘s greater 1000… 😕
... View more
Dec 19 2021
1:09 AM
hi guys, first of all I‘ve been through some documentations already regarding the MS390 and I think to know that this product is still a not useable one in a productive environment… but unfortunately a customer has this switch in use connected to a MS425! I always use on the 802.1q trunks native vlan1 and all vlans allowed on them but on the MS390 this limitation of 1000 vlans exists… https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/MS_Installation_Guides/MS390_Series_Installation_Guide#Stack_Cabling_Installation so whats your suggestion how the trunk ports should be configured on both sides - the MS425 and the MS390? thanks in advance for any kind of help!
... View more
Oct 25 2021
11:03 AM
what does the keyword option ‘ignore‘ mean in detail? Ignore: This option will appear as selected if there is a newer firmware version available but nothing is currently scheduled. If an upgrade was scheduled but was subsequently cancelled (either from the Organization > Firmware Upgrades page or by Support), the Ignore option will be selected. does this mean that all updates are ignored or only a specific one?!
... View more
Sep 27 2021
11:20 PM
2 Kudos
@cmr this options are available for my organization...
... View more
Sep 24 2021
1:13 AM
first I´ve upgraded to Version 15.43.1 -> no change, issue still existing, now I changed to the stable one which is 15.44 -> no change as well, the problem unfortunately still exists 😞 I´ll open a case and check with the support-team...
... View more
Sep 23 2021
11:04 PM
Hi all, same on my side with 15.43 - I´ll give it a try and will upgrade to 15.43.1! thanks @Thierno for the information! 🙂
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
Subject | Kudos | Views |
---|---|---|
2 | 6554 | |
2 | 4426 | |
1 | 2841 | |
1 | 2091 |