Bump for this topic, can someone from Meraki please confirm an ETA for the vMX Large in Azure? ... View more

Has anyone tried either of these workarounds?   1. Use LDAPS from Meraki local auth to Azure AD (needs azure connectivity) - https://apicli.com/2021/12/13/meraki-mr-802-1x-with-azure-active-directory/   2. Use an Azure-hosted captive portal that uses OAuth to Azure AD - https://developer.cisco.com/codeexchange/github/repo/rafael-carvalho/meraki-azure-ad/   ... View more

Still no updates on AnyConnect for the MX?   I'm guessing if it's in Firmware 16.x (like mentioned above), then the older appliances won't support it (as they don't run 15.x)? ... View more

Can Meraki support please make that doc public so we can read it?   Agreed that having to replace the VM isn't ideal! ... View more

Yes, the Meraki maintenance is similar to SMARTnet, except that it only covers hardware - you still need your MR License to get software/TAC support from Meraki. ... View more

Thanks for the detail on how to configure the MX PoE port - this should be in the doco as a use case! ... View more

Also given the MG21E has external antennas, the antennas could be mounted outside the truck & the MG could be mounted inside - just needs a short cable through the truck (sealed of course). ... View more

Are there any further fixes to this? Being able to add MG's to a "live" branch using an existing template would be ideal. ... View more

Good explanation @Bruce !   Has anyone (Meraki SE or partner/customer) tried this yet? It would be good to see it as a documented & supported use case. ... View more

That sounds like a suitable workaround, but obviously not ideal if the MG21 is further away (dual cable runs).   It also prevents the "MG to dual MX" HA option... so unfortunately the "dedicated VLAN on a PoE switch" seems like the best option. ... View more

I’m seeing this behaviour even when MAC randomisation (Private Address setting on the iOS device) is Disabled.   Hopefully Apple has a fix soon. ... View more

192.0.2.0/24 is an IP range reserved for documentation (as per RFC5737).   So definitely sounds like a bug!   Can you try using OSPF instead? ... View more

We've had success with the Huawei E3276 on the MX84 & MX64's, using both Telstra & Optus SIMs. ... View more

It's unfortunate as there's a huge increase in malware/etc using HTTPS to bypass basic filtering.   SSL inspection is a big gap for the MX-line, certainly it'd be a very welcome feature! ... View more

I'm pretty sure Auto-VPN (and SD-WAN) will work fine on an MPLS link.   I think Alex's reference to "labelled traffic" means the MX won't run MPLS tagging - but from a typical customer perspective, any Ethernet-delivered IP circuit should be fine.   The MX can now run BGP, but in a "pure" Auto-VPN / SD-WAN environment there's no need as all the routing is done via the tunnels - the MX just uses the WAN IP address for connectivity, so only needs a static route to the PE. ... View more