Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Become a member of the Cisco Meraki Community today
Get answers from our community of experts in record time.
Join now- About Ayush_Oberoi
About Ayush_Oberoi
Community Record
12
Posts
8
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Aug 12 2025
8:08 PM
2 Kudos
@RWelch I’ll go through the documents you shared. Not sure why, but I’m unable to reply on the same thread. Thanks for sharing them really appreciate your support to the community.
... View more
Aug 12 2025
7:59 PM
2 Kudos
They are on same floor, and as @RWelch mentioned i wish they were stackable.
... View more
Aug 12 2025
7:58 PM
2 Kudos
Thanks @RWelch — understood. I can lower the priority on one link so it becomes the preferred path and the other link stays as the backup that way if the primary link fails the backup comes up. Note that the MX250 doesn’t support LACP, so I can’t do link aggregation there. I’m also short on SFPs I only have the last 4 SFPs free. Given that, my options are: Run everything on STP (no LACP) so I can use the 10G SFP downlinks where needed and keep a failover path via STP, or Use copper for all uplinks and reserve the SFPs for specific 10G links later (and forego SFP downlinks for now). I’m leaning toward putting everything on STP for now to preserve the SFPs and still maintain a failover window. Open to pushback if that’s a bad trade-off.
... View more
Aug 12 2025
7:30 PM
Thanks for sharing this, @RWelch Based on your input, I’ve put together two different network designs. Could you please suggest if these would be loop-free? In both scenarios, I’ll be electing one of the switches as the STP root and still distributing my APs and IoT devices evenly across the switches. Looking forward to your feedback! .
... View more
Aug 12 2025
6:08 PM
Hi Folks, Looking for feedback on the attached network diagram. Below is the planned setup: 1 × MX250 4 × MS130-48X 20 × CW-9166i-MR Due to budget constraints, we’re starting with a single firewall for now, but plan to add a second one in the near future for redundancy. Would appreciate your thoughts on whether this design looks good or if any improvements are suggested. Thanks in advance!
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Other
Aug 7 2025
5:08 AM
So in that case I don't have to invest in other switch if in future i have to get 4 more Ap's i can still use them without any hassle.
... View more
Aug 7 2025
4:02 AM
i have MS-130-24X in my system i am already using 6 MR56 access point on this switch, since i require 3 more AP's, is it viable to use them on a 1Gig port without much of limitations. Appreciate your help on this. Regards
... View more
Jul 30 2025
11:52 PM
Hi, I understand that LIC-MX95-SDW-3Y is an SD-WAN Plus license. However, could you please let me know if this is the correct license to overcome the following error? "License Z**-**-9* is an Advanced Security license, but your organization’s existing license is for SD-WAN. If you wish to upgrade your Advanced Security license, please contact Support."*
... View more
Jul 30 2025
10:02 PM
While claiming my adv security license in the dashboard i encountered the below message. "License Z***-****-9*** is an Advanced Security license, but your organization’s existing license is for SD-WAN. If you wish to upgrade your Advanced Security license, please contact Support". I am not sure which license is my organization is using. as per above should i go ahead with which of the following license below. LIC-MX95-SDW-3Y LIC-MX95-ENT-3Y Looking forward for your inputs. Regards.
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Firewall
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1419 | |
| 2 | 1437 | |
| 2 | 1439 | |
| 2 | 2036 |
© 2025 Cisco Systems, Inc.
