@GroupeBleu, I respect your views and on a couple of points, I agree with you. The ability to "pay" for support would have been a good option along with the time to first response when contacting support, and selfishly speaking internal switching speeds. I think where I am left confused is additional support or 3rd party development on the hardware. If it is possible that effort belongs to the community that wants to hack the hardware in question. You also bring up WRT on older hardware for your customers (I assume) feels less supported than anything M-Go offered. Seeing hardware is never a joyous event, but at least customers have two-plus years to find a new direction to go and implement. If you are upset about how M-Go is handling this winddown take a look at the forums at U_ and their USG line. Again, you do have the right to be upset along with the right to express displeasure but I hope you can take a step back and see admins didn't get completely blindsided. @MiriamK I'm not sure who in marketing is dealing with products for SMBs, but Cisco has a gap in route when they dropped the RV router line. As someone who consults or installs networks the clients that would invest in M-Go or Cisco Small Business wouldn't be the best fit for Meraki proper. The licensing is the show stopper, and once admins look for a single pane of glass option or consistent UI design admins will start to move to other vendors.
... View more