Probably a role issue https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Managing_Dashboard_Access/Configuring_SAML_Single_Sign-on_for_Dashboard#Create_SAML_Roles_in_Dashboard ... View more

Are you using SAML 2.0 and is your SAML user unique or does the admin already have a non-SAML dashboard account? https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Managing_Dashboard_Access/Configuring_SAML_Single_Sign-on_for_Dashboard ... View more

It appears to be a feature request, please login to your dashboard and click the "Give your feedback" button on the bottom right of every page. snmpwalk -v2c -t 10 -c xxx -Ob -M +. -m +MERAKI-CLOUD-CONTROLLER-MIB snmp.meraki.com:16100 .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.22.1  IP-MIB::ipNetToMediaEntry = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID   snmpwalk -v2c -t 10 -c meraki 192.168.128.2:161 .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.22.1  .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.22.1 : Unknown Object Identifier (Sub-id not found: ipNetToMediaTable -> 1 ) ... View more

I did not know that message was also sent to the Syslog, just learned something new, It is possible to request any feature you wish, log in to the dashboard and click the "Give your feedback" button. ... View more

If you no longer have physical access to the device and need to remove the agent, remote commands similar to the following may be used. Please note you are deleting files and executing commands at your risk. launchctl unload /Library/LaunchDaemons/com.meraki.agentd.plist rm -f /Library/Application Support/Meraki/m_agent /Library/Application Support/Meraki/m_agent_upgrade rm -rf '/Library/Application Support/Meraki/' rm -f /Library/LaunchDaemons/com.meraki.agentd.plist or launchctl unload /Library/LaunchDaemons/com.meraki.agentd.plist && rm -f /Library/LaunchDaemons/com.meraki.agentd.plist && rm -rf "/Library/Application Support/Meraki/" && rm -rf “/usr/local/sbin/Meraki/“ && rm -f /usr/local/sbin/m_agent* ... View more

Check out https://documentation.meraki.com/SM/Device_Enrollment/Uninstalling_Systems_Manager_and_Removing_Managed_Devices#macOS ... View more

That message normally appears when the Event Log gets "spammed" with the same event type in a very short period of time.   If you want to capture all entries regardless if they are the same entry or not, you can leverage your own Syslog and integrate it with the dashboard, this way you will always have a copy of every message that was sent to the Event Log. https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Monitoring_and_Reporting/Syslog_Server_Overview_and_Configuration ... View more

Hello COBIT,   SBL is available but not in conjunction with SAML, I will share the configuration article below. https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Client_VPN/AnyConnect_on_the_MX_Appliance/Client_deployment#Start_Before_Logon Please use the "Give your feedback" button on the bottom right of every dashboard page to request/suggest this feature to Cisco Meraki. ... View more

Hello mkane,   I have so many questions, it must have been an exceptional experience to work with such brilliant people, I'm sure you must have some incredible stories to share.   Glad to have another Meraki veteran on board, I'll see you around in the cloud side! ... View more

Generally speaking, it is always best to have traffic shaping rules, to ensure the important traffic to you is shaped or the bandwidth you need is available. Traffic shaping works by device type, so let's suppose you applied Traffic Shaping to prioritise audio and video at the MR level, then only the MR will prioritise that traffic, once it makes it onto the next hop such as an MS or MX it will be treated as best effort, just like every other traffic type, but if you apply Traffic Shaping in the MS or MX now that traffic will also get treated with priority over everything else.   Keep in mind that once traffic leaves out the WAN, it's always treated as best effort unless you have some QoS service agreement with your ISP. ... View more

Welcome Berlin, of course you're lucky, you can manage an entire network infrastructure from your desk, with no requirement for on-site visits to do the day-to-day duties! But if you want to be extra lucky, just continue participating in the community giveaways and contests, then you can get some sweet swag, if you get extra you can send it by post to me 😄 ... View more

Welcome to the community space, we're glad to have you here, 5 years using Meraki you must have run into some interesting projects I bet, thanks for joining us. ... View more

This is expected to be solved on MR29 firmware. ... View more

That is awesome, I love these projects, it really brings the creativity out and ingenuity out of a person, keep sharing,  and you might need to add a Meraki MT10 Sensor in there for "completion" 😅 https://meraki.cisco.com/product/sensors/indoor-sensors/mt10/   ... View more

You might need to get creative and it might be achievable.   You can build a script that looks at all client's latency, when a client's latency exceeds a certain value, you can then shut its port down, there might be limitations, such as if the client is on WiFi, you might not want to shut the port down because you would effectively shut down the entire Access Point, but this is why I mentioned being creative.   Here are some APIs to get you started: https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api/#!get-network-client-latency-stats https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/?dtid=osoblg000513#!update-device-switch-port   Do let us know if you eventually get around to crafting a script to achieve your goal, it would be very interesting to look at it.   Cheers.   ... View more

The Client VPN setup should be the same, I was on OS X Catalina, Big Sur, and now Monterey, and the configuration has never changed.   https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Client_VPN/Client_VPN_OS_Configuration#macOS ... View more

The link below describes the rules, restrictions, and other settings that can be controlled via group policy on each platform: https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Cross-Platform_Content/Creating_and_Applying_Group_Policies#Available_Options ... View more

As @PhilipDAth mentioned the test user does not need to exist. If you are seeing this error message it is because at least one user recently failed to authenticate with the radius server or a recent dashboard radius server test failed. Each SSID that has radius enabled will have an option in the setting called "Radius Testing", by default this option is set to enabled. If enabled, the Meraki devices will send every 24 hours an Access-Request message to these RADIUS servers using  'meraki_8021x_test' to ensure that the RADIUS servers are reachable.  If a RADIUS test fails for a given device it will be tested again every hour until a passing result occurs. A subsequent pass will mark the server reachable and clear the alert, returning to the 24-hour testing cycle. Therefore if you are seeing this alert, one or more of your radius servers failed to respond or took too long to respond, if you do not want the dashboard to run these tests you can disable the option under your SSID settings. https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Cross-Platform_Content/Alert_-_Recent_802.1X_Failure ✌️ ... View more

Thanks, I have included that in my report, please do create a case with Meraki support and request your case to be assigned to me or linked to mine, the engineer will know what to do. 👍   Regards, Berto   ... View more

That does not correlate with my findings, the different MR52s that I tested with, all worked on the 27.7.1, 28.6, and 28.6.1, one example is provided below for an MR52 on 28.6.1   [{"startTs":"2022-06-06T10:00:00Z","endTs":"2022-06-06T10:10:00Z","avgLatencyMs":16}, {"startTs":"2022-06-06T10:10:00Z","endTs":"2022-06-06T10:20:00Z","avgLatencyMs":2}, {"startTs":"2022-06-06T10:20:00Z","endTs":"2022-06-06T10:30:00Z","avgLatencyMs":2}, {"startTs":"2022-06-06T10:30:00Z","endTs":"2022-06-06T10:40:00Z","avgLatencyMs":2}, {"startTs":"2022-06-06T10:40:00Z","endTs":"2022-06-06T10:50:00Z","avgLatencyMs":2}, {"startTs":"2022-06-06T10:50:00Z","endTs":"2022-06-06T11:00:00Z","avgLatencyMs":3}]   Can you please tell me which models you specifically tried with?   Furthermore, I do suggest that you raise a case with support so that you can be informed of any updates in relation to this issue. ... View more

Hello webfrank,   I was actually looking into this behaviour this morning, it appears to affect some models but not all, which device model do you have, and which firmware version are you running in it?   Cheers.   ... View more

If you run a packet capture on the wired interface of the AP on which the client is connected, do you see the full DORA exchange as a client tries to associate with the network?   It's been a while since my windows days, I assume it should only populate the lease table after the Ack back from the endpoint? On the client itself, do you see the entire IP assignment configured as expected, IP, mask, gateway, VLAN?  Does the communication only not work if going towards the internet? Are you able to ping the gateway? Could you have some L3 block, possibly a missing return route upstream of the MS? Are the wired clients on the same VLAN as the wireless clients?       ... View more