I've seen a few others ask for this as well.  I haven't seen anything on their changelog or beta firmwares though yet so I'm not sure if it's on their radar.   ... View more

Being live data won't it be changing constantly?  Sorry for the basic questions, just trying to help where I can 🙂 ... View more

We have our systems manager stuff in its own dedicated network.   ... View more

Are you wanting to find total utilization?  Network Wide>Traffic Analytics and select Security Appliance?  Or are you just wanting to see total utilization for a given interface? ... View more

Is this for your wireless devices?  Take a look at this as well https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/Radio_Settings/Fixing_Regulatory_Domain_Mismatches ... View more

Your device should only be using USB/Cellular if the WAN connection(s) fail.  It'll still show it but the line should be flat.     What data are you wanting to get?   Also there is a difference in display if you are on the Security Appliance Summary tab vs the Uplink tab.  ... View more

Can you record normally and then just run the export through a tool that filters the faces before utilizing any video?  In the event you had to turn it over to an agency etc.   Or are you not even allowed to record video with faces? ... View more

I have this document bookmarked for when I need to access a device via its local configuration page: https://documentation.meraki.com/zGeneral_Administration/Tools_and_Troubleshooting/Using_the_Cisco_Meraki_Device_Local_Status_Page   Just keep in mind that the abilities are much more limited via the local configuration page compared to the cloud configuration.  Best bet is to have redundant internet connections when possible.    Note:  One particularly problematic area of having a device that can only be managed from the cloud is with the Meraki MX devices.  If you want to make a route change when the MX is offline you cannot do it from the cloud or the local config.  The device has to be online to make route changes.  ... View more

So here is how we do this.   WAN to MX100's.  Thankfully our Comcast and Verizon modems have multiple LAN ports so we connect those to WAN1 and WAN2 on both MX100's.  Then we have a virtual IP setup between the two MX100's.    MX100's to Core stack Port 4 on MX100-1 to Port 1 on Core SW1 Port 5 on MX100-1 to Port 2 on Core SW1   Port 4 on MX100-2 to Port 1 on Core SW2 Port 5 on MX100-2 to Port 2 on Core SW2   EDIT:  You don't have to use the port numbers above, I just used them for example purposes.   ... View more

@PhilipDAth wrote: I'm not sure the actual day you would consider the community to have come into life - but I'm thinking we must be within 90 days of it being 12 months old.   So how to we celebrate that occasion? Philip nudges @CarolineS   Related content says 8/21 https://community.meraki.com/t5/Community-Announcements/Happy-4-month-birthday-Meraki-Community/ba-p/7950 ... View more

@MFuchs wrote: Just tried an upgrade from 10.23 to 10.26 last night and again ran into issues. Some switches were stuck in blinking white state. Downgrading did not solve this completely, too... Some seemed to run 10.23 and some 10.26. So it seems as if there still would be some issues with this upgrading process... Thanks I'm going to work on a notoriously problematic switch this Thursday evening.  Support recommended I call them before attempting so they can enable more detailed logging.  The one's I've had problems with usually get stuck in that non-responsive state and when I power cycle them they usually finish the upgrade.  ... View more

Setting the policy on the device to whitelist will exclude them from the splash page but will also exclude them from any traffic shaping and other restrictions.  So use that carefully.   ... View more

Some of the dialog here seems to indicate that it may not be possible but it is an old thread and also slightly different.  https://community.meraki.com/t5/Security-SD-WAN/MX65W-access-control-with-meraki-authentication-when-MR32-also/m-p/2482#M612   I tried to dig through some of my devices to verify but seems I don't have any 64W or 65W's to check.  Do you have the device added to a dashboard where you can look through the settings? ... View more

According to this https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/Firewall_and_Traffic_Shaping/Wireless_Client_Isolation   "With Client Isolation enabled, clients will only be able to communicate with the default gateway and will not be able to communicate with any other devices on the same VLAN (or broadcast domain). In order for the wireless client to communicate with another device, the upstream gateway must be used to enable this communication (Eg Inter VLAN routing and ACLs). Any traffic bound for an address on the same VLAN as a device in client isolation will be denied. Traffic bound for other VLANs will be forwarded and routed normally."   So sounds like it may be possible if you are doing inter VLAN.  But I haven't tested this so I'll have to defer to other members of the group that use this functionality more often.  For our guest networks, I just use "NAT mode: Use Meraki DHCP" when I do not want the clients to be able to talk to each other.  When they do need to talk to each other I have a separate network/VLAN.  ... View more

I'm working on my own API dashboard for this so I'd be interested to see what you come up with for SNMP.  Following this.  ... View more

I believe the Layer 2 isolation would work counter to your goal here.  It will isolate all of the devices so they cannot communicate to each other.  If you need devices to be able to talk to each other you may want to disable layer 2 for that SSID.  ... View more

Looks good, maybe this will help encourage some solution marking.  And nice example snippet 😉 ... View more

@Stephen88 wrote: So no other ideas??? If the port you have the AP connected to has a native VLAN of 10 set then try removing the VLAN from the static IP configuration you have on the AP.  I had an environment where that helped.     ... View more

I'd start with looking into the power cable, surge strip, PDU, battery backup etc.  Should be easy to eliminate some of those if other things are sharing them.  Otherwise, a device issue is likely.  ... View more

Should be by default but make sure POE is turned on for the port setting as well.  But the other posters are more than likely on the right track about it being the old POE standard.  We have a few of those floating around that cause trouble with some of our MS POE switches as well.  ... View more

Can you explain the topology and how you desire for this to work?  Sorry for all the questions, I'm just trying to formulate some ideas for you.  We use a lot of private MPLS links but we just failover to internet/VPN so I don't have much experience with HSRP.   ... View more

Private MPLS circuit? ... View more

Thanks, glad to hear it.  We've had some issues with balancing as well where clients will hold onto further less signal APs in lieu of ones that are closer.   ... View more