@pjc wrote:
MR18 is not an old model, end of sale was only 2017. It's bugs like these (if it is as a result of a bug introduced in new firmware) that worry me, and with end of support at 2024 for this model we shouldn't have to bin these older models or have them firmware locked. I still have a few MR16's, again firmware locked because of a bug introduce in 25.x
I hopeful that the firmware release quality control improves significantly in the future
Sorry, I meant 'old' in the sense that it is old gear within my realm of what we are using, being replaced with MR33s etc. I suppose from a tech perspective they are 'old' in the sense that they are only 802.11n, but in reality I agree they are not that old and should still be fully functional with firmware that supports it.
In my experience, mix of several hundred MR16 and MR18, the moment we moved from 24.X to 25.X is when we started having issues and the only time we didn't, was when they were replaced with MR33s.
The only way I see this being fixed is if they actually do some deep-dive root cause analysis. I attempted to assist them with this and provided packet captures, and went out of my way to show them what the issue was (at the time it was basically the AP not sending any Association Response frames after receiving Association Requests, which was fixed by rebooting the AP or changing the radio channel to another one which effectively 'rebooted' the radio). The response I got was always the same....upgrade to latest firmware. I've said it before and I'll say it again, how can a new firmware magically have a fix for a problem, if you refuse to actually figure out what the problem is?
It basically just became easier for me to have them upgraded hardware wise than trying to wrestle with them on it.