Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- About Chris_Watkins
Chris_Watkins
Here to help
Member since Dec 8, 2021
04-21-2022
Community Record
12
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
03-14-2022
05:56 AM
I am going to try to do this myself, but it Seems I am getting conflicting information.
... View more
03-14-2022
05:49 AM
Has something changed? We were using AnyConnect and RADIUS when we switched to the Meraki and were told that AnyConnect was not supported.
... View more
03-08-2022
11:50 AM
Hi rymiles, I believe that is what I want, will take me a bit to read thru it. Thanks.
... View more
03-08-2022
11:20 AM
We replaced our Cisco ASA with a MX provided & supported by our ISP. for multiple reasons. The ASA had 1 VPN account for our HVAC vendor that was restricted to 2 IP addresses. Now I can't seem to get anyone at our ISP to even acknowledge my requests to do this, basically telling me its my problem and restrict them thru Active Directory permissions. We are authenticating the VPN with AD, however these 2 IP addresses are PLC's and do not talk Active Directory. Mostly pleased with the MX, but not very happy that I have to tell the HVAC people they're out of luck. No way am I giving them full network access. Any Ideas?
... View more
02-25-2022
09:17 AM
My previous statement of the AP's being in NAT mode wasn't entirely correct. We have 3 SSID's. 2 are Bridge & 1 is NAT. The guest ssid was set to NAT as an attempt to give guest's internet only and no LAN access. So I've changed to Bridge and enabled LAN isolation on this guest ssid. If this sounds like an incorrect move, feel free to correct me.
... View more
02-25-2022
08:14 AM
It is a separate network, as the MX is provided & supported by our ISP, although I do have full control of it. The AP's are in NAT mode, although they have static IP's assigned within the Client network range. which - now that I've looked at the settings seems to be contradictory to what the NAT intention is. It seems static IP's have made the AP's function as Bridge mode. ?? I'm taking over several previous setups so trying to figure out the best course of action
... View more
02-25-2022
07:28 AM
We have a MX67 that shows our access points as being the end users of data. For example, if Billy uses his iphone to browse youtube, while connected to a MR33 AP: The clients page in the MX shows that the MR33 was the device that used the bandwith, instead of Billy's iphone. Is there a way to change setup so the switches & AP's are invisible to the reporting of data usage?
... View more
02-25-2022
07:00 AM
I still have multiple MR16's and 1 MR18 with this issue of nothing will connect until they are rebooted, then they work fine for a few days. We've been manually rebooting them a couple times per week for over a year, but it's a royal pain. Is it possible to revert the firmware only on the 16's & 18's and keep the newer firmware on the newer AP's? How do I get the older firmware?
... View more
12-09-2021
04:55 AM
What the heck is going on here?
... View more
12-09-2021
03:29 AM
MX67 shows VPN is connected, but I cannot do anything on LAN. I can ping devices on LAN by IP address. ping -a "IP" returns the proper device name I can ping devices on LAN by name, but the reply IP address is my ISP, and not the device it should be. My PPP connection does not have a default gateway address. Is this normal? Any Ideas?
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Client VPN
12-08-2021
10:37 AM
My subnets are not the same, so I don't think that is related. Thanks though
... View more
12-08-2021
10:30 AM
Did this ever get resolved? I have a similar issue where client VPN is connected but I am unable to access anything on the LAN. My PPP connection shows that its IP is in the Client VPN subnet, but it has no default gateway address. I can ping stuff on the LAN by ping -a IP address and the FQDN is returned. however if I ping that same FQDN by name I get a different IP returned.
... View more
