- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
RSTP between Catalyst Switch and MS Switch
Dear All,
We want to make catalyst switch(Core) below as an RSTP root primary and secondary for several MS switches under the Core :
We have already state the all the MS switch RSTP priority to the maximum value of 61140
but, it seems the root switch still on each MS
is there any approaches to move the RSTP root to the Catalyst Core Switch, below a brief config on catalyst
glad to hear any response from you all
Solved! Go to solution.
- Labels:
-
Layer 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @meraki-newbie ,
As others have mentioned, it is recommended to run Multiple Spanning Tree on the Catalysts. As it is built upon IEEE 802.1D & IEEE 802.1w
You can achieve interoperability with RSTP & Rapid-PVST. However, it requires careful planning and configuration. See below excerpt from the guide below.
‘MS series switches can participate in spanning tree only when a spanning tree instance is running on Native VLAN of ALL switches. In addition, Native VLAN must be allowed on all Trunk ports running Rapid-PVST, so that BPDUs are seen by the Meraki switches in the topology.’
Cheers,
Ivan Jukić,
Meraki APJC
If you found this post helpful, please give it kudos. If it solved your problem, click "accept as solution" so that others can benefit from it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Most convert to mstp on catalyst with meraki for stability.
But Rstp-rpvst should also work, it runs on native vlan. (Doc says vlan1) https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Port_and_VLAN_Configuration/Configuring_Spanning_Tree_on_Meraki_...
Do you have a trunk with native vlan on both sides?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
so for stability we need to configgure mstp on catalyst?
yes we have already run native vlan 99 between ms <> catalyst trunk ports
but the root port not appearing at Catalyst, as we expected
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
As per the note in the document provided by @ww switch to mst:
Note: To avoid unexpected issues where an MS is between two R-PVST switches (such as a Cisco Catalyst Root Bridge < MS > Catalyst switch). It is recommended to convert the topology to a MSTP on the Catalyst switches. This will avoid potential port inconsistency errors and other issues that may cause instability in the STP topology.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/darrenoconnor/
I'm not an employee of Cisco/Meraki. My posts are based on Meraki best practice and what has worked for me in the field.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Alright,
so, with this topology below
MX1-MX2
|. |
CAT1-CAT2
\. /
MS125
we should set MSTP between 2 CATALYST (CAT1 & CAT2) setup the CAT1 as root & CAT2 as secondary root..
meanwhile on the MS125, just config RSTP with highest number priority available, so the forwarding path will be
CAT1-CAT2
MS125-CAT1
and the blocking path will be
MS125-CAT2
is my understanding of the concept correct?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
CAT1 and CAT2 are not in a VSS configuration ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
for now we didn't use the VSS between CAT1-CAT2 (WSC3850)... should we set VSS the CAT1-CAT2 for better results?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I couldn't see the model from your screenshot. These switches do not support VSS
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @meraki-newbie ,
As others have mentioned, it is recommended to run Multiple Spanning Tree on the Catalysts. As it is built upon IEEE 802.1D & IEEE 802.1w
You can achieve interoperability with RSTP & Rapid-PVST. However, it requires careful planning and configuration. See below excerpt from the guide below.
‘MS series switches can participate in spanning tree only when a spanning tree instance is running on Native VLAN of ALL switches. In addition, Native VLAN must be allowed on all Trunk ports running Rapid-PVST, so that BPDUs are seen by the Meraki switches in the topology.’
Cheers,
Ivan Jukić,
Meraki APJC
If you found this post helpful, please give it kudos. If it solved your problem, click "accept as solution" so that others can benefit from it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It works
the root bridge of MS125 is our Catalyst C3850 core..
we set up MSTP between C3850 ..
Core 1 MSTP priority 4096
Core 2 MSTP priority 8192
All MS125 RSTP priority 61140
thanks all..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Nice!!!!! Well done!.
Cheers,
Ivan Jukić,
Meraki APJC
If you found this post helpful, please give it kudos. If it solved your problem, click "accept as solution" so that others can benefit from it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I agree with Ivan that ‘MS series switches can participate in spanning tree only when a spanning tree instance is running on Native VLAN of ALL switches. In addition, Native VLAN must be allowed on all Trunk ports running Rapid-PVST, so that BPDUs are seen by the Meraki switches in the topology.’
