Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- About meraki-newbie
meraki-newbie
Here to help
Member since Apr 9, 2023
2 weeks ago
Community Record
16
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
3 weeks ago
so, is that mean when i want to add new role such as "MONITOR", it will use the same SHA1 tokens as "USER" and "ADMIN" ?
... View more
3 weeks ago
another question is, should the role on IDP defined before tokens generated? for an example, if i have already create role "ADMIN" on my IDP (Jumpcloud) then generate SHA1 token, and filled it on meraki dashboard. and in another moment, i need to add new role "USER" on my IDP, should i generate the new SHA1 token? and filled it again on meraki dashboard?
... View more
3 weeks ago
yep, it's seem pretty easy, but still lack of documentation, for jumpcloud step couldn't get as clearer than setting up on ADFS/Azure.. hopefully could have more details guides like this : https://www.miniorange.com/cisco-meraki-single-sign-on-(sso) cheers
... View more
3 weeks ago
Could we add different user roles using single X.509 cert SHA1 fingerprint ? or we need to create another IdP for different roles? such as ADMIN role will be using X.509 cert SHA1 fingerprint AAAA USER role will be using X.509 cert SHA1 fingerprint BBBB thanks
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Administrators
3 weeks ago
Dear All, we want to using Jumpcloud as a SSO portal before login to meraki dashboard... Is there any clear guide for Jumpcloud and Meraki side setup? thanks
... View more
11-06-2023
12:49 AM
Alright that's very clear. but for another question is, could we configure interface vlan and default route from the MS410 to Forti, using Local Status page ? due to our ISP installation is on going
... View more
11-05-2023
11:42 PM
Dear All, We want to deploy MR 46 AP > MS 350 ACCESS SWITCH > MS 410 CORE SWITCH > SDWAN Router Fortinet 600E There are several question, : What is the best possible, using MS 410 CORE or SDWAN Router Fortinet 600E as user+management gateway ? If we could implement this topology above, is that NAT will be performed at Fortinet level ? due to there are no MX SDWAN Appliance.. so all MS and MR switch management will be NAT at Fortinet ? thank you
... View more
11-05-2023
06:00 AM
Dear all, we want to create MS410 as an Core Switch for any user gateway, Could we create Interface Vlan as user Gateway on MS410 ? If we could, then how to configure it? is that using localpage or we need to add the MS410 to the dashboard before?
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Layer 3
08-10-2023
08:42 PM
Hello all, we have some issue that, we couldn't see any dot1x event log on Dashboard for MS390-48UX2, though we could see the dot1x event log on MS125-48FP model. Is there anybody has the same problem ? Thank you
... View more
05-11-2023
01:21 AM
we have already disable web cache as TAC suggestion, but it didn't resolve
... View more
05-09-2023
06:37 PM
is that means, the higher version than 17.10.5, such as 18.10.6 or 18.10.7 will resolve it too ? or only will resolve on 17.10.5 ?
... View more
05-09-2023
12:28 AM
Hi all, I have some issue, that under my current MX84 that using MX 17.10.4 firmware coluldn't reach any http web domain. It's confusing since i didn't apply any content filtering/firewall setting to http domain. Could anyone share some thoughts? Did I need to upgrade to the MX 18.107 ? Thank you
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Firewall
04-09-2023
07:08 PM
Hi all, Currently we have two sites (Site-A and Site-B) using MX-84 as an service gateway for each site. Each site have their own uplink with 2 ISP. Site-A have ISP-1 & ISP-2 WAN uplink Site-B have ISP-1 & ISP-2 WAN uplink So we need to subscribed to 4 WAN Connectivity. We have plan to merge those sites into only 2 WAN Connectivity by merging Site-A and Site-B, and resulting topology like this : Site-A-Trunk to-Site-B-WAN Uplink We want MX84 on site A , behave like an MS Switch that has no any WAN uplink but could be managed. Could we have this topology applied using MX 84 ? Thank you
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Other
