cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Meraki as CORE switch vs Regular managed switch

SOLVED
Kind of a big deal

Meraki as CORE switch vs Regular managed switch

Now I have heard from many people (not in the community) that they won't ever use Meraki as a core switch. What are your opinions?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Highlighted
Kind of a big deal

Re: Meraki as CORE switch vs Regular managed switch

I tend to use either Cisco Nexus Switches, Cisco Catalyst switches, or Cisco Meraki switches.  It just depends.

 

If the DC is only used say 18 hours a day, and scheduling in outages for regular firmware upgrades is not an issue then I'll use Meraki.

 

If the environment needs VRF, or has complex routing requirements then it'll be a Cisco Nexus or Cisco Catalyst solution.  If the environment needs absolute 24x7 uptime then I'll probably head towards a Catalyst chassis solution with dual supervisors.

5 REPLIES 5
Kind of a big deal ww
Kind of a big deal

Re: Meraki as CORE switch vs Regular managed switch

for a branch i think its fine. for a DC you probably want to tune routing, timers etc for compatibility, and you dont want updates and reboots often. 

Kind of a big deal

Re: Meraki as CORE switch vs Regular managed switch

I think it really depends on the network and what you want / need to do. We run 2 x MS425-32 in a stack configuration, we dont however use the core switches for our layer 3 routing as I wasn't happy with the limitations that Meraki has around L3 routing.

 

 

Meraki CMNO, Ruckus WISE, Sonicwall CSSA, Allied Telesis CASE & CAI
Highlighted
Kind of a big deal

Re: Meraki as CORE switch vs Regular managed switch

I tend to use either Cisco Nexus Switches, Cisco Catalyst switches, or Cisco Meraki switches.  It just depends.

 

If the DC is only used say 18 hours a day, and scheduling in outages for regular firmware upgrades is not an issue then I'll use Meraki.

 

If the environment needs VRF, or has complex routing requirements then it'll be a Cisco Nexus or Cisco Catalyst solution.  If the environment needs absolute 24x7 uptime then I'll probably head towards a Catalyst chassis solution with dual supervisors.

Kind of a big deal

Re: Meraki as CORE switch vs Regular managed switch

I'm with @PhilipDAth on this. Couldn't have said it better.

Kind of a big deal

Re: Meraki as CORE switch vs Regular managed switch

Thank you all for your input. I really appreciate the considerations and factors. 

Welcome to the Meraki Community!
To start contributing, simply sign in with your Cisco account. If you don't yet have a Cisco account, you can sign up.