Dual Linking 2x MS450-12 to MS425-32's to 100x MS390-48UX

OM1000
Here to help

Dual Linking 2x MS450-12 to MS425-32's to 100x MS390-48UX

Hi everyone, 

 

I am curious if this will work as a load balancing/MLAG link. 

 

Please see below the topology. 

 

OM1000_0-1675310059930.png

 

Thank you!

4 Replies 4
Soichiro-Ono
Getting noticed

Hello.

 

It seems that there are many intermediate SWs for the purpose of port conversion. 

If the access is "x100", is it 2000 ports? Well, you should prepare the necessary number of L3-SW.

I'm going out so I haven't seen it in terms of load balancing/MLAG links. (Personal impression.)

 

Regard,

If you found this post helpful, please give it kudos.
If my answer solved your problem, click "accept as solution" so that others can benefit from it.
有用な回答だと思われる際にはkudoをクリックして頂けると幸いです。
回答があなたの問題を解決した場合、accept as solutionをクリックしてください。

Hi, 

 

Sorry, its only 100 total access. So, 200 on the access side and 200 on L3. I was curious if running that many dual links to each switch is possible with the MS435-32's?

 

Thanks!

Hi.

 

I think it works. The following documents are helpful. 

Switch Ports - Cisco Meraki

Link Aggregation and Load Balancing - Cisco Meraki

Switch Stacks - Cisco Meraki

 

However, the question remains whether this is really the best topology. 

 

Regard,

If you found this post helpful, please give it kudos.
If my answer solved your problem, click "accept as solution" so that others can benefit from it.
有用な回答だと思われる際にはkudoをクリックして頂けると幸いです。
回答があなたの問題を解決した場合、accept as solutionをクリックしてください。

Thanks for the documentation. 

 

In your thoughts what would you suggest be the best topology in this case? 

 

I am trying to maximize bandwidth across a massive 1.5 mill Sq.Ft facility while being the most redundant I possibly can. 

 

Thanks Soichiro!

 

Appreciate the time.

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.