2 MS's connected, best practices

Solved
SKSVFD
Here to help

2 MS's connected, best practices

In my main data center I've got 2 MS420's, not in a stack. I've got 4 10g fiber lines going from the datacenter to another building and on that side I have a MS225. I'd like to get as much bandwidth as possible between the two as I've got a backup appliance getting moved to the other building.  Does it make more sense to have all of the connections going to just 1 MS420 to avoid a loop? Or do 2 connections to each MS420 for failover? Do I aggregate ports on both sides? 

1 Accepted Solution
PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

My first thought is what size connection does the backup appliance have to the switch?  Gigabit?  A pair of 10Gbe?

 

If you ignore redundancy, a 4 port Etherchannel from the MS225 to a single MS420 will give the most throughput and is particularly easy.

 

You could stack the two MS420's and then split the 4 x 10Gbe connections across them in an EtherChannel.  The only downside is when doing firmware updates both switches will get rebooted at the same time.  If this is not an issue, then I'd do this.

View solution in original post

8 Replies 8
PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

My first thought is what size connection does the backup appliance have to the switch?  Gigabit?  A pair of 10Gbe?

 

If you ignore redundancy, a 4 port Etherchannel from the MS225 to a single MS420 will give the most throughput and is particularly easy.

 

You could stack the two MS420's and then split the 4 x 10Gbe connections across them in an EtherChannel.  The only downside is when doing firmware updates both switches will get rebooted at the same time.  If this is not an issue, then I'd do this.

SKSVFD
Here to help

Philip, thanks for the response. The current backup appliance has 4 1GB connections, however we want room for growth later. Currently I only have 2 of the 10GB fiber connections hooked up. The redundancy isn't really necessary in this case. If one of the switches go out it would be really easy to move connections.

 

Firmware updates on both switches at the same time aren't an issue either. If switching from 2 independent switches to 1 stack is it a pretty straightforward process? Or will a lot of configuration need to be changed on the ports?

cmr
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

@SKSVFD stacking them shouldn't mess up the config for each port, and I'd normally never not do it, but see my post about 355s...

If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

>If switching from 2 independent switches to 1 stack is it a pretty straightforward process?

 

Trivial.

redsector
Head in the Cloud

@PhilipDAth I´d agree.

But Sometimes when upgrading and rebooting the stack there is a STP trouble while the stack is booting and the firmware is not finished booting up and not finished creating the aggregat / etherchannel.

Inderdeep
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

@SKSVFD : This is for you, best practice for MS design !

https://documentation.meraki.com/Architectures_and_Best_Practices/Cisco_Meraki_Best_Practice_Design/...

 

Regards/Inder
Cisco IT Blogs awarded in 2020 & 2021
www.thenetworkdna.com
SKSVFD
Here to help

Thank you for this link!

 

Scott

Thygesen
Building a reputation

Great Page !  

Thanx ! Always something to pick up !

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.
Welcome to the Meraki Community!
To start contributing, simply sign in with your Cisco account. If you don't yet have a Cisco account, you can sign up.
Labels