Wireless slow on a MX64W

Solved
Dudley5526
Here to help

Wireless slow on a MX64W

I have a MX64W configured as a spoke.  It is connected to the hub by a Cat6 cable.  The distance is approx 75 yards. The devices connected directly by patch cable to the MX have decent speed.  Users are complaining about the speed of the wireless.  Uplink is set at 250 bps. Suggestions on how to improve wireless bandwidth speed?

1 Accepted Solution
alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal

No, the MX64w is not an access point, it is a security appliance with Wi-Fi capability.

The MX64w has limitations compared to an MR and is recommended for small offices.

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.

View solution in original post

14 Replies 14
alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal

Do you have any traffic shaping rules configured?

How many clients do you have connected to your network simultaneously?

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
Dudley5526
Here to help

Uplink set at 250bps

load balancing disabled

Active-Active Auto VPN enabled

Global bandwidth limits unlimited

Default traffic shaping rules

Currently 4 clients, sometimes as many as 10

alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal

Are you sure it's bytes per second? Isn't it 250 megabytes (MBs)?

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
Dudley5526
Here to help

Typo its 250 Mbps

alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal

One more question, what version are you running?

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
Dudley5526
Here to help

MX 18.107.10

alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal

Try updating to version 18.107.12.

 

In order to run this version you need to update to the latest stable version (18.211.5.2)

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
Mloraditch
Kind of a big deal

There is much less you can configure and monitor as far as the built in wireless on an MX vs an MR. Have you checked for interference? Tried updating auto channels or setting custom channels? Made sure the antennas are properly seated?


If you found this post helpful, please give it Kudos. If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
Dudley5526
Here to help

I tried to update auto channels but it failed. There are users connected. I'll have to try Monday when I am on site. I'll also reseat the antennas and interference.

PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

> It is connected to the hub by a Cat6 cable.

 

When you say this, do you mean you have another MX as your main security appliance, and then you have this MX64W being used only as an access point?

 

Are there any other access points in the environment?

 

Are you saying users are 69m (75 yards) from the MX64W?

When users connect to the WiFi, is is clear and unobstructed, or do they have to go through several walls?

Dudley5526
Here to help

The MX64W is an access point. We have a MX 250 as our primary security appliance.  No other access points other than the WAPs. The MX64W is approx 75 yards from the MX250 and is connected by a CAT6 cable. The users notice slow access whether they are in the same office as the MX64 or in the rest of the building.

alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal

No, the MX64w is not an access point, it is a security appliance with Wi-Fi capability.

The MX64w has limitations compared to an MR and is recommended for small offices.

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
Dudley5526
Here to help

I inherited this set up and never felt it was quite right.  It's time to use the correct MR.

 

Thank you

PhilipDAth
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

If it is more than 20m away from the users - I would consider adding an extra AP as well.

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.