Umbrella DNS vs Google DNS for DHCP

Solved
Mloraditch
A model citizen

Umbrella DNS vs Google DNS for DHCP

Does using the Umbrella DNS option provide any benefit over using Google? I had someone tell me it does. We use other products for filtering and I didn't think Umbrella gave away anything for free anymore, but I am struggling to find any documentation one way or the other as most things point to the enhanced integrations that are now available.

1 Accepted Solution
DarrenOC
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

  • Hi @Mloraditch , you are right in that Umbrella DNS does weed out the bad.  I would personally use Umbrella DNS over Google DNS. Both are free for the purpose you’ll be using them for but Umbrella DNS can stop such things as C&C etc
Darren OConnor | doconnor@resalire.co.uk
https://www.linkedin.com/in/darrenoconnor/

I'm not an employee of Cisco/Meraki. My posts are based on Meraki best practice and what has worked for me in the field.

View solution in original post

9 Replies 9
RWelch
Head in the Cloud

Whitepaper: DNS Security with Meraki MR & Umbrella 

Manually Integrating Cisco Umbrella with Meraki Networks 

If you found this post helpful, please give it Kudos. If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
RWelch
Head in the Cloud

https://community.meraki.com/t5/Wireless/Umbrella-and-Meraki-integration/m-p/80787

If you found this post helpful, please give it Kudos. If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
Mloraditch
A model citizen

So that's not what I'm looking for. I'm asking if literally the only thing I have is Meraki DHCP handing out Umbrella DNS vs Google DNS. Does that Umbrella DNS provide anything different than the Google DNS? The person I talked to was under the impression that Umbrella DNS blocks some really  bad things by default if we use it vs Google not doing that.

DarrenOC
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

  • Hi @Mloraditch , you are right in that Umbrella DNS does weed out the bad.  I would personally use Umbrella DNS over Google DNS. Both are free for the purpose you’ll be using them for but Umbrella DNS can stop such things as C&C etc
Darren OConnor | doconnor@resalire.co.uk
https://www.linkedin.com/in/darrenoconnor/

I'm not an employee of Cisco/Meraki. My posts are based on Meraki best practice and what has worked for me in the field.
BlakeRichardson
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Umbrella to get the most benefits requires licensing. You can create an account and have it monitor your DNS request but without licensing I don't believe it will provide filtering.

 

https://one.one.one.one/dns/ is a Cloudflare alternative. 

If you found this post helpful, please give it Kudos. If my answer solves your problem, please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
pdeleuw
Getting noticed

A real alternative is https://quad9.net/. You can choose between filtered DNS and unfiltered DNS.

Brash
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

As said above, essentially "Use Umbrella" points to Umbrella/OpenDNS servers. My understanding is that this includes some very basic security type filtering (known Malware domains, C&C's etc.) Unlike the paid version of Umbrella, this does not include any content filtering, granularity of policies or reporting.

 

Google DNS is using Google's DNS servers with no filtering at all.

Khancock
Just browsing

Using Umbrella DNS should give you the built in security for the known bad or malicious sites - that constanly gets updated, but you would not be able to add your own without the Umbrella subscription,

Mloraditch
A model citizen

Thanks all I definitely understand how paid umbrella works and its capabilities just needed the clarification I got.

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.
Welcome to the Meraki Community!
To start contributing, simply sign in with your Cisco account. If you don't yet have a Cisco account, you can sign up.
Labels