Azure Virtual WAN

[Gd29]

any roadmap to support azure virtual wan? 

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/virtual-wan-locations-partners

Connectivity through partners

You can check the links in this section for more information about services offered by partners. If your branch device partner is not listed in the section below, have your branch device provider contact us. They can contact us by sending an email to azurevirtualwan@microsoft.com.

Partners

Barracuda Networks

Check Point

Citrix

Cloudgenix

Netfoundry

Palo Alto Networks

Riverbed Technology

128 Technology

The following partners are slated on our roadmap for the near future: Arista, F5 Networks, Fortinet, Silver-Peak, Velocloud, Versa, Nuage Nokia.

[PhilipDAth]

With Meraki already have a vMX for Azure - what would be the benefit of doing this?

[Gd29]

@PhilipDAth haven't setup any VPN to Azure yet, but maybe cost or management. at the very least its another option. It supports standard IPSEC, but it seems like it can be a one button setup with integration to the Meraki API.

I'm assuming that part of not doing this is to push the vMX.

[JimmyPhelan · Accepted solution]

Digging this back up, but recently Meraki was named on an Azure Virtual WAN article

https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/updates/azure-virtual-wan-multiple-capabilities-and-new-partners-n...

Is there any information from the Meraki side as to what we can do with this?

Edit: Just found this

https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Deployment_Guides/Cisco_Meraki_MX_Branch_to_Azure_Virtual_WAN_De...

I see some serious points in this, first being IKEv2, second being a Beta firmware, 15.xx