Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- About Jyrki_Halonen
About Jyrki_Halonen
Jyrki_Halonen
Getting noticed
Member since Dec 9, 2022
2 weeks ago
Community Record
24
Posts
2
Kudos
1
Solution
Badges
Mar 8 2024
10:36 AM
Sure in ideal world everybody would HA everything, but as always it is the matter of cost and needs in small setups
... View more
Mar 8 2024
8:30 AM
About the design: I do have HA FW in place connected to switch-stack but I didn,t draw it to the picture since it is irrelevant for the problem.
... View more
Mar 8 2024
5:53 AM
I have MX95 connected to MS-switch: WAN1 interface for ISP IC-network and LAN9 port for multiple internal VLANs. ISP is connected with 2x1G LACP channel to switch and LACP is configured to 802.1Q trunk with IC-network tagged to VLAN 10. Picture of connection: MX firewall WAN should be configured with static IP address provided by ISP. My question is: should I configure VLAN 10 IP to MX under: - Security & SD-WAN / Configure / Addressing & VLANs / Routing or - Security & SD-WAN / Monitor / Appliance status / Uplink / WAN1 ?
... View more
Feb 27 2024
5:59 AM
This is how connection is built. WAN 1 is the primary uplink, but MG51 is connected directly to the MXs as a failover WAN.
... View more
Feb 27 2024
5:10 AM
"Secondary uplink cannot be used for Internet connectivity" - this can't be true since Meraki usecase shows that MG can be used for WAN failover. for the DHCP: Dashboard states for Passtrhough mode: "This option can be used to disable the MG cellular gateway NAT. In this mode, the MG will forward the IP address provided by the carrier to a client behind it." Cellular uplink: I'm not using cellular uplink on MX
... View more
Feb 26 2024
11:19 PM
I have a MG51 which is connected to MX95 WAN port4. I try to establish IPsec VPN to non-Meraki firewall but I can't get tunnel working. When MG IP addressing & NAT deployment mode is 'Routed', I can see MG providing IP address 172.31.128.x at MX WAN2 uplink (SFP+ is not installed to WAN2), but IPsec VPN is not established. Otherwise connection to MX works on this setting When trying to use 'Passthrough' mode on MG, the MX95 WAN 2 uplink status is 'Failed'. and connection to MX is not working at all. Why MG is not forwarding the IP address provided by the carrier to MX in 'Passthrough' mode?
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Firewall
Feb 23 2024
12:13 AM
I updated to 3.101 and now UI shows the speed correctly, thanks.
... View more
Feb 20 2024
3:25 AM
I have MG51 router port 1 connected to MX95 WAN port 4. When checking port connection speeds from both devices, result looks like: - MG51 port 1: connected 10 Mpbs Full duplex - MX95 WAN port 4: connected 2,5 Gpbs Full duplex. Is this UI bug or which speed information is correct?
... View more
Feb 14 2024
3:11 AM
I have MG51 with one SIM installed, but can't connect to Cellular network. Local status page says:"Status: PIN_required". How can I enter PIN code to the card?
... View more
Dec 19 2023
10:43 PM
1 Kudo
I got an answer from Meraki Support that this is a bug in software: "It appears that you are hitting an unexpected behavior, where the API endpoint getOrganizationDevices returns "not running configured version". This is currently being looked into by our development. We do not have an ETA currently however I will keep you updated on our progress."
... View more
Dec 19 2023
12:13 AM
I opened a ticket for this, let's see what support finds out. I also noticed that this same issue was also fo MR76 HW with firmware version MR 30.5
... View more
Dec 18 2023
1:07 AM
Device model is MR44. In Meraki Dashboard it shows the version correctly to MR 30.5.
... View more
Dec 18 2023
12:25 AM
I noticed with Meraki MR44 HW with MR 30.5 firmware following: when fetching device information from MR device with API, firmware version shows in API response: "firmware": "Not running configured version". In other MR-devices running with version 29.5.1 API response is correct: "firmware": "wireless-29-5-1". Is this a bug in MR 30.5 ?
... View more
Oct 12 2023
6:35 AM
I'm making Wi-Fi planning to office floor-map. In the tool I'm using there are no Meraki MX devices configured, but all MR models are there. Does someone know which MR model would be closest to MX68W when comparing Wi-Fi 2 and 5 GHz coverage?
... View more
Oct 10 2023
2:36 AM
I read some blog that MX could connect to another MX with AutoVPN even MXs would have different licensing within the organization.Is this information valid?
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Auto VPN
Jul 28 2023
5:06 AM
I have an organisation with multiple networks in it. All networks are bound to same Configuration template. I want to define STP-root for each network and I thought to do this: 1) Create individual Switch template to each site and configure STP root bridge priority and select corresponding HW-model to that template 2) Bind the wanted STP-root switch to that network's switch template 3) do this to all networks Few questions: 1) Can someone see any drawbacks on this thinking? 2) If there is already local configs, like port settings, on the switch what I'm about to bind to the switch template, will those be overwritten to the values from the template?
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Layer 2
Jul 5 2023
1:54 AM
Do you have any information or link for the new capabilities?
... View more
Jul 4 2023
3:35 AM
"If 2 ports are right next to each other on a switch but they both are on different VLANs" In this case isolation makes no role, since they are on different VLANs. Isolation is restricting L2 traffic within a VLAN. So the use case you described it should be fine.
... View more
Jul 4 2023
3:25 AM
I'm in process to built a security solution for Meraki customer. I planned use Cloud on-ramp to build the connection, but there is a limitation for max 250 Mbps BW for the traffic. I found the solution that using IPsec VPNs instead there is a possibility to overcome this 250 Mbps limit by setting up multiple VPNs and use ECMP between those. Have someone built such solution between MX and Umbrella? Is there some restrictios? How many VPNs can be used within same ECMP? any other limitations or notifications of such idea?
... View more
May 25 2023
3:47 AM
hi, how can I clone a broken switch configuration to a new one if the device is bind to a template?
... View more
Dec 16 2022
12:24 AM
1 Kudo
There are so many lovely places what I have visited, but to mention few top ones I would say Bora Bora, South Africa and from Europe I would say skiing in Switzerland :). Next new countries I think will come from South America where I'm plannig to go next year.
... View more
Dec 13 2022
10:56 PM
hi, I'm Jyrki Halonen and I'm working in a service provide company called Netox. My role is lead architect of networks and it includes network environments in DC and in customer sites. We are using quite a bit of Meraki devices, but only MX, MS and MR devices. In the future I want to expand the other Meraki options also to build wider visibility to infrastructure. From the community I'm looking support and help to the questions I'll have in the future. And fun fact about myself: I love to travel and aim is to visit over 100 countries 😊.
... View more
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 800 | Dec 19 2023 10:43 PM |
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 800 | |
| 1 | 629 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
