Hello,  With or without the MIB the Walk will return all the accessible values and nothing returned gives us any indication of ports existing other than what  you see in the image above of the ifTable for that device.  Does any one know for a fact that the Uplink ports one / two / tree/ four ( How ever many a device might have )  are the ports listed in the standard ifTable ?  Is there anything in the MIB that ties the WAN uplink ports to the ports in the  ifTable?  I know that executing a query using the API will return the status / information about the uplink ports ?  I am trying to connect the dots between the what the API returns and what we see using SNMP. Thanks.  ... View more

So for MX devices we can see the ifTable and a handfull of ports  Are the Uplink ports part of that table or are they * Other* ports ?  I was of the understanding ( maybe misguided ) That they  were not listed as part of the ifTable True / False?   Thank you,    PS: We enabled WebHooks for some conditions to see what they contained and the UplikStatus change Notification contains No more Usefull information than the trap ?  ... View more

Perfect thank you ! ... View more

Indeed they do refer to differing conditions - which make it more concerning that they should somehow Both be tied to the same trap ?  Thanks,  ... View more

Indeed Phillip,  Sad but probably true... ... View more

Hello Gentlemen,  I don't have access to the Prod Meraki console and have no idea how to find * A* device in the sea of 40,000 that has those values filled in 🙂 So I am looking for someone to share actual examples of what I can expect to see in those variables.  Thanks ... View more

Meraki has always been weak in the SNMP space. ... View more

I guess *Everything* talks to the Meraki Controller and that's the perspective from which the determination is made as to whether the devices is Up or Not 🙂 ( which might not be quite true - the devices might be Just Fine and functioning in the customers isolated environment... but the Controller can't reach then so there Down 😞  ???  ... View more

I have written some thing similar recently, except I have use a HTML interface to display my results ... View more

Moving to another system yielded some improvements ! - like it Worked - but still took nearly 5 minutes to get a "list" of one Organization back... Wow this is So slow... I could walk over to the Closet and count the devices, faster than it comes back with the answer 😋   ... View more

Hi,  If addresses are given out via DHCP - *Usually* the DHCP server / Application know what addresses are in use / leased and does not give out the same address again, and again. Client should observe the Terms and Conditions of the Lease and I imagine should request a new address when their lease expires. I didn't not know there where special conditions where *normal* DHCP protocol practices were not adhered to ? Looking into this a bit more - the device may have gone offline,  Before the lease ended leaving them to appear as having the Old address ... - Please disregard this thread - sorry - for the bother. Don ... View more

That sounds like a very reasonable approach initially - I'd have to look into how *Easy* it is / would be to slice and dice the Organizations by User ! Thank you ! Don ... View more

Glad it was helpful !👍 ... View more

Belay that last inquiry,   I was able to extract the added fields using this syntax:   https://api.meraki.com/api/v0/networks/N_57758665221026xxxxx/sm/devices?fields={phoneNumber},{imei} ... View more

WHOOPS! I just realized that we'd said we'd give away 5 pairs of socks to survey respondents, and I only have awarded 4! So... @AndyG is the lucky winner of the LAST pair of socks! Congrats, Andy! (Stay tuned for an email from me to confirm your mailing address) ... View more

VAfter investigating this Further - the IP Address returned by the API query is NOT the device IP, but  the NAT overload address ? so the API call is all but Useless ~  ( for our needs ) ... View more

Hello,   Once you get the traps to the other platform you will likely run into the issue we are having - the trap contain No IP or Hostname target information only the MAC address , Network Name / customer/Site / State / issue data. MAC is not the normal lookup value so were trying to build a workaround.   I understand the devices are DHCP so IP *might* not be a valid target if its constantly changing. - but other customers I have talked to are using DHCP Reservation to have consistent IP Addresses used. We need something other than MAC in the traps to identify the target !   Don ... View more