Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About daniel_abbatt
daniel_abbatt
Getting noticed
Member since Dec 9, 2021
2 weeks ago
Community Record
39
Posts
21
Kudos
7
Solutions
Badges
Nov 13 2024
5:48 AM
I see that we acknowledge those responses (such as a 400) evident by our logging of that response against the specific webhook on our systems, and I don't believe retries are sent for those as a response has already been received.
... View more
May 16 2024
1:54 AM
2 Kudos
You are right but if writing a tool, not only for my configurations, the tool does not have history of the secret, it should retrieve from API and restore if necessary.
... View more
Mar 28 2024
4:27 AM
Ideally from the Cases section in Dashboard (? at the top right > Cases) ; alternatively from meraki.com/support, however you'll need to provide some details about which organisation, so I'd recommend the first method! Giac
... View more
Sep 11 2023
12:38 AM
1 Kudo
You can make a call to the identities endpoint to see which user is associated with the current API key https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/get-administered-identities-me/ Then you can use that email to correlate with the admins endpoint and see what orgAccess you have. https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/get-organization-admins/ As noted already, there may be further restrictions on what you can do in a particular network, i.e. with cameras.
... View more
Jun 13 2023
6:18 AM
Thanks, that sounds excellent; we use the spec internally to validate all our strongly typed interfaces to make sure we've got the request/response models correct etc and of course this only fully works for those that have been specified so anything in this area is welcomed. I can't remember what the spec allows but another thing we struggle with is whether a property on a response object will always be there or whether sometimes it isn't, and/or when it is can have a null value. We currently have to guess which response properties might be null and define our models appropriately, this useful for the consumer of the library as they'll know when to expect values or not.
... View more
May 26 2023
1:05 AM
Many thanks Daniel for this end-point that I didn't know
... View more
Apr 18 2023
3:46 AM
yea that's exactly what I was using. I had a faint hope that the settings that were copied would be available as data but never mind lol. Thanks!
... View more
Apr 18 2023
12:03 AM
I think the statuses just match the ones listed in the main documentation... https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Cross-Platform_Content/Status_Icon_Meanings ...from that page: Every device can display in one of four colors, indicating the status of that device: Green: The Cisco Meraki device is currently online and has no alerts Yellow: The Cisco Meraki device is currently online but has one or more active alerts Red: The Cisco Meraki device is currently offline and is inaccessible by the Cisco Meraki Dashboard Grey: The Cisco Meraki device is currently offline and has been offline for at least a week (dormant). These indicators can be a quick and easy way to narrow down what sort of trouble a device is experiencing. A device indicating it is offline likely cannot reach it's gateway or Dashboard. A device indicating a yellow alerting status will often have additional details on the device details page. Examples include IP address conflicts or disconnection from RADIUS.
... View more
Mar 29 2023
2:00 PM
Yes it can. I don't have an example for you but if you Google using nuget packages with Powershell that should help.
... View more
Mar 28 2023
6:30 AM
Note, I just tried the same test with 'appliance' and 'wireless' and it works as expected. Both the organizations/[org-id]/networks and /networks/[net-id], return the correct productTypes list. Maybe it is something to do with systemsManager? Although the original post didn't have systemsManager set.
... View more
Feb 22 2023
6:38 AM
If you think there is a bug/error with the API, I suggest open a support case (via Dashboard) to ensure it is recognised and gets attention.
... View more
Jan 10 2023
2:40 AM
It looks like the repo has been fixed in some way as the latest version is 1.29 and no longer 1.30. The release notes still only show 1.28 but the change log now includes 1.29 https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/whats-new/#!v1-29-0
... View more
May 27 2022
3:45 AM
Since there was quite a big interesting on it, I further developed the Meraki-explorer adding some features and fixing some small bugs. Now is possible to configure most important settings of the Meraki Dashboard API Python Library like retry time, maximum_retries and so on: The script execution will now retry on error (if configured) and continue to the next device/network in the loop without stopping. A detailled error logs ill be shown at the end.
... View more
Apr 7 2022
1:47 AM
1 Kudo
Could we get some more and clarified documentation on what the new interfaceId is on the Network Appliance VLAN? The response documentation for https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!get-network-appliance-vlans shows it is a number, but an actual response shows it as a string? Please update the response documentation as I believe it is wrong. I assume this is the unique internal identifier which will can used by other endpoints to uniquely reference a specific VLAN. I think this must be the Ids which are returned by the switch static route endpoint which for IP offset definitions was returning the VLAN unique Id and we never knew which VLAN this was? Please clarify if this is the case. The following endpoints don't show the value in the example but the value is returned - Please update the response documentation to include interfaceId. Please update the documentation for the following responses: https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!create-network-appliance-vlan https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!update-network-appliance-vlan
... View more
Mar 24 2022
2:32 AM
A small caveat to this is that you can of course only retrieve it if you HAVE a network bound to it.
... View more
Feb 10 2022
4:42 PM
1 Kudo
Accepted as solution: "the documentation is way too vague and doesn't contain the right info or correct info." ...as well as providing a solution to the specific nightmare I was suffering! Thanks, @RaphaelL 🙂
... View more
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2842 | Sep 11 2023 12:38 AM | |
| 1250 | May 25 2023 8:11 AM | |
| 1246 | Apr 27 2023 9:52 AM | |
| 1186 | Apr 17 2023 10:50 AM | |
| 883 | Jan 10 2023 2:40 AM | |
| 3104 | Mar 21 2022 12:34 AM | |
| 1392 | Mar 8 2022 2:20 PM |
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1186 | |
| 3 | 16478 | |
| 2 | 1543 | |
| 2 | 2873 | |
| 2 | 1392 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
