Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About Gini_Dev_Team
Gini_Dev_Team
Here to help
Member since Jun 16, 2021
Jun 8 2023
Community Record
18
Posts
2
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Jun 8 2023
12:27 AM
The second one suits me. However that's mean that I have to manage by myself and from my perspective it is more a Meraki rule and so on the Meraki side.
... View more
Jun 8 2023
12:22 AM
That's a good idea but from my perspective it is a rule that should be implemented into Meraki and the result be exposed to the client (thanks to an attribute such as "elligibleToTopologyRequest")
... View more
Jun 5 2023
6:39 AM
Hello, Because I am facing some limitations (ie : 429 http rc) with the automatic use of Meraki's API, I would like to improve my software by changing the design. In few words, today I am using several endpoints with network_id as parameter. For example : - /api/v1/networks/{networkId}/appliance/warmSpare - /api/v1/networks/{networkId}/topology/linkLayer - /api/v1/networks/{networkId}/appliance/vlans - /api/v1/networks/{networkId}/appliance/trafficShaping/uplinkBandwidth - /api/v1/networks/{networkId}/appliance/vlans/settings Some of my clients have more than 600 network_ids. These means that I generate more than 3000 requests if I want the infos up-to-date for this client. Does it exist a feature such as "subscription to event : change on this network_id" ? With this event, I will be informed that I have to request this network_id and so I will hugely decrease my sollicitation to the API because I will request only this network_id. Many thanks in advance for a response Chris
... View more
Jun 5 2023
6:27 AM
Hello, I am using the end-point : GET /networks/{networkId}/topology/linkLayer The doc describing it is there : https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!get-network-topology-link-layer It responds correctly in some cases. But in some cases I have the following response : "errors": [ "Invalid network for topology" ] Because I would like to not request anymore on these networks I would like to have an attribute bringing the information that it is not a valid network for topology. Do you know if there is any end-point API which could give me such info (Network valid for topology or not) ? Many thanks in advance Chris
... View more
May 26 2023
1:05 AM
Many thanks Daniel for this end-point that I didn't know
... View more
May 25 2023
7:14 AM
Good idea, but that means that I have to maintain by myself such an attribute and to periodically try again to collect data on every network_id in case of one has been activated between the 2 batchs. From my point of view, this management should not have to be done by the API customer. In fact this "VLAN enabled" data is a "functional data". May be, it could be present into the response to the API end-point : GET /organizations/{organizationId}/networks see https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!get-organization-networks
... View more
May 25 2023
1:04 AM
Hello, I am using the end-point : GET /networks/{networkId}/appliance/vlans The doc describing it is there : https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!get-network-appliance-vlans I am only using it for MX devices. It responds correctly when the VLANs are enabled,. But in case they are not, I have the following response : "errors": [ "VLANs are not enabled for this network" ] Because I would like to not request anymore on MX devices which don't have the option enable, I would like to have an attribute bringing this information. Do you know if there is any end-point API which could give me such info (VLAN enable or not) ? Many thanks in advance Chris
... View more
Mar 8 2023
9:26 AM
Yes I do ... for sure ... but the head_license_id is always null What does that mean ? Is it a specific case : per-device or co-term ?
... View more
Mar 8 2023
9:24 AM
Hello, Into the API documentation, I didn't find any information about Devices which should have a sim card inserted and which didn’t have. How to determine such device (with sim card not inserted) ? Many Thanks in advance
... View more
Mar 8 2023
5:05 AM
Hello, Into the API documentation, I didn't find any information about Devices which should have a sim card inserted and which didn’t have. The only documentation I found is : 3G/4G Cellular Failover with USB Modems - Cisco Meraki , status “Ready – Active – Connecting – Failed” for the interface mean there is a SIM card inserted into the MX. “Active” is a synonym of up. Could you please help me ? Many Thanks in advance
... View more
Mar 7 2023
3:11 AM
Hello, I recently discover that in the following end-point : GET /organizations/ described here : https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!get-organizations a new attribute appears : management It is explained : "management : Information about the organization's management system" " |--> details : Details related to organization management, possibly empty" My question are : What is the use case for a MSP ? In other terms, why should I use such kind of data ? Do you have any documentation on this and how to use it ? Many thanks in advance
... View more
Mar 7 2023
3:01 AM
Hello, I recently discover that in the following end-point : GET /organizations/{organizationId}/licenses described here : https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!get-organization-licenses a new attribute appears : head_license_id It is explained : "The id of the head license this license is queued behind. If there is no head license, it returns null." My question are : What is the use case for a MSP ? In other terms, why should I use such kind of data ? Do you have any documentation on this ? Many thanks in advance
... View more
May 24 2022
11:31 PM
Hello, For sure, I have to chose between waiting for a Meraki development or implementing a solution. Whatever the solution will be I would like to thanks for our exchange ! That's a community state of mind that I appreciate Chris
... View more
May 23 2022
2:35 AM
Hello, Thank you for your response. The difficulty is not managing a loop but rather than already have a end-point with informations on a device. From my point of view, adding a simple attribute (empry or filled) containing his "partner" device (the spare one) could be an added value. And in fact, this improvement will avoid to request again on each network_id. In terms of bandwidth ... for sure the threshold is high but it is reachable if we create some monitoring automation. Regards Chris
... View more
May 20 2022
5:10 AM
Hello, In order to get the PrimarySerial and SpareSerial today I am using the following endpoint : /networks/{networkId}/appliance/warmSpare However, that means that I have to realize a loop on all the networkid of one customer. But, today I also already use the following endpoint : /organizations/{organizationId}/devices My question is : Could it be possible to add the SpareSerial attribute into the response of the endpoint /organizations/{organizationId}/devices This will increase my efficiency and decrease your API sollicitation. Many thanks in advance for you response Christian C.
... View more
Feb 25 2022
1:21 AM
1 Kudo
Hi Tom, Thank you very much for your sharing ! In fact, in 2020 (date of the initial post) the https://api.meraki.com/api/v1/organizations/ response didn't contain any ['licensing']['model'] attribute. Now it is possible and your proposal is elegant ! Thanks ! Christian
... View more
Jun 17 2021
12:18 AM
Hello, For some organization-id I have empty array responses instead of of filled json one for others. Is that a normal situation ? How should I know the organization-id which will have not empty responses ? Many thanks in advance Christian C.
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Dashboard API
My Top Kudoed Posts
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
