The Meraki Community
Register or Sign in
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • About mljevakovic
mljevakovic

mljevakovic

Here to help

Member since Aug 9, 2021

‎04-27-2022
Kudos from
User Count
KRobert
KRobert
1
MeredithW
Meraki Alumni (Retired) MeredithW
1
cmr
Kind of a big deal cmr
2
CarolineS
Community Manager CarolineS
1
View All

Community Record

9
Posts
5
Kudos
0
Solutions

Badges

CMNA
Meraki FIT Level One
Meraki FIT Level Two
First 5 Posts View All
Latest Contributions by mljevakovic
  • Topics mljevakovic has Participated In
  • Latest Contributions by mljevakovic

Re: Community Challenge: Two Twosday Tips

by mljevakovic in Community Announcements
‎02-22-2022 11:35 PM
1 Kudo
‎02-22-2022 11:35 PM
1 Kudo
My two topics:   1st  Network-wide -> Monitor -> Clients 2nd Insight -> Monitor -> Web App Health   ... View more

Re: Google

by mljevakovic in Security / SD-WAN
‎09-24-2021 06:50 AM
‎09-24-2021 06:50 AM
Hi, everythnig works fine. These are results from my network   C:\Users\xxxx>nslookup gmail.com Server: UnKnown Address: 192.168.1.1 Non-authoritative answer: DNS request timed out. timeout was 2 seconds. Name: gmail.com Address: 142.250.180.197 C:\Users\xxxx>nslookup google.com Server: UnKnown Address: 192.168.1.1 Non-authoritative answer: DNS request timed out. timeout was 2 seconds. Name: google.com Address: 142.250.201.206 C:\Users\xxxx>nslookup youtube.com Server: UnKnown Address: 192.168.1.1 Non-authoritative answer: DNS request timed out. timeout was 2 seconds. Name: youtube.com Address: 142.250.180.206     C:\Users\xxxx>ping gmail.com Pinging gmail.com [142.250.180.197] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 142.250.180.197: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=111 Ping statistics for 142.250.180.197: Packets: Sent = 1, Received = 1, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 32ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 32ms Control-C ^C C:\Users\xxxx>ping youtube.com Pinging youtube.com [142.250.201.206] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 142.250.201.206: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=53 Ping statistics for 142.250.201.206: Packets: Sent = 1, Received = 1, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 32ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 32ms Control-C ^C C:\Users\xxxx> ... View more

Re: Client VPN subnet cannot reach local lan subnet

by mljevakovic in Security / SD-WAN
‎09-14-2021 03:07 AM
‎09-14-2021 03:07 AM
I'm just wandering if you clients network (home network) is the same subnet like your server net 192.168.0.0/24? If it is it could be a problem. ... View more

Re: Multiple VPN connection issues

by mljevakovic in Security / SD-WAN
‎08-30-2021 11:19 PM
‎08-30-2021 11:19 PM
Hi @Ranel_Laroco , could you confirm that both VPN clients work correctly in the situation when is only one active? Next what I'd be do is to when connect use one or other VPN client, take of routes which a VPN server provides to VPN client (I mean which networks will be protected with VPN tunnel). example Cisco AnyConnect Per picture only networks: 192.168.1.0/24, 192.168.10.0/24,192.168.100.0/24, 192.168.200.0/24, 192.168.1.4/32 are protected I just use two VPN clients: Cisco AnyConnect and PulseSecure at the same time ... View more

Re: Multiple VPN connection issues

by mljevakovic in Security / SD-WAN
‎08-30-2021 11:50 AM
2 Kudos
‎08-30-2021 11:50 AM
2 Kudos
If I understood well your network design is like on picture:                     By my experience you can have two different VPN clients (I have Cisco Anyconnect and Watchguard, or AnyConnect and PulseSecure). It works. But every connection profile has split tunneling enabled on VPN server, LANs on server's side are different subnets, VPN ip pools are different and neither VPN servers push the same subnets as on the other Site. It should work. ... View more

Re: 🎁 🍰 🎈 Happy 4th Birthday, Meraki Community! 🎈 🍰 🎁

by mljevakovic in Community Announcements
‎08-29-2021 01:05 PM
2 Kudos
‎08-29-2021 01:05 PM
2 Kudos
Congrats Meraki Community!!! I wish you Many years of successful journey!!🎉 ... View more

Re: Public IP Pool!

by mljevakovic in Security / SD-WAN
‎08-29-2021 11:12 AM
‎08-29-2021 11:12 AM
If you got public IP subnet for link as /30 subnet and the rest of you public IP address is pool /24 subnet Than you can just add that subnet to inside part (interface) to the rest of your network. In this case a ISP has route to this /24 pool of these public addresses via /30 subnet. You can use the rest of your pool as you want. Use it as the whole /24 subnet or divide it in smaller chunks of subnets for example 2x/25 sunets or 4x/26 subnets  etc.. M ... View more

Re: Public IP Pool!

by mljevakovic in Security / SD-WAN
‎08-29-2021 11:04 AM
‎08-29-2021 11:04 AM
Hi, did you try ip nat overload feature? Maybe this link will help you. https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/NAT_and_Port_Forwarding/Port_Forwarding_and_NAT_Rules_on_the_MX M ... View more
Kudos from
User Count
KRobert
KRobert
1
MeredithW
Meraki Alumni (Retired) MeredithW
1
cmr
Kind of a big deal cmr
2
CarolineS
Community Manager CarolineS
1
View All
My Top Kudoed Posts
Subject Kudos Views

Re: Multiple VPN connection issues

Security / SD-WAN
2 2870

Re: 🎁 🍰 🎈 Happy 4th Birthday, Meraki Community! 🎈 🍰 🎁

Community Announcements
2 9345

Re: Community Challenge: Two Twosday Tips

Community Announcements
1 6028
View All
Powered by Khoros
custom.footer.
  • Community Guidelines
  • Cisco Privacy
  • Khoros Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms of Use
© 2023 Meraki