Meraki

张起东 · ‎Apr 24 2022

nice

Zac123 · ‎Feb 1 2022

Thanks for your reply Manjinder. I read that in documentation and is why I thought it sits between 6 and 7.

Zac123 · ‎Jan 31 2022

I have an update on the issue. We moved the devices (WAN and LAN ports) off the fabric extenders and on to the switches that the extenders connect to, and now the issue isn't happening anymore. I can reboot either MX without the connected switchport going in to errdisable state.

KarstenI · ‎Dec 21 2021

Yes, you can do that in with the MX.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 30 2021

If you click the Allow more connections link you can enter lines for specific protocol, ports, and remote IPs to allow

KarstenI · ‎Nov 9 2021

Meraki Support can enable a beta feature named "custom layer 3 inbound firewall rules" where you have more flexibility in controlling the inbound way similar to what is available now for outbound rules. Perhaps this feature is of benefit for you.

Zac123 · ‎Apr 16 2021

Thanks for the replies all! It sounds like migrating while running the routers in parallel is the best way to swap this out. Thanks again.

Meraki

Community

About Zac123

Zac123

Community Record

Badges

Re: VPN Registry Disconnected But Can Be Pinged - HA MXs with VIP

Re: Source-based Default Route Priority

Re: Rebooting MX95 Triggers BPDU Guard

Re: Using The Same Object Group For Source And Destination On A Rule

Re: Public IPs on Local Devices

Re: Port Forwarding and Firewall Rules

Re: Hub/spoke VPN Setup With Meraki Hub and Non-Meraki Peers

Re: Rebooting MX95 Triggers BPDU Guard