AP = Access Points indeed. Wireless Access Points ... View more

@Woosie  have you actually used those VANTEV antennas and cables you are mentioning with a MX67C?  Im curious to know if it really worked fine and solved your problem. ... View more

Follow normal recommendations for STP. On out case, we are using MS devices as L2 only at the access layer.. Our core L3 devices are 4500 cisco. we use the follwing settings that work perfect. *Root guard: Configure at core on all ports to access switches and on access switches to APs *BPDU guard: Configure in all access ports *Loop guard: Configure in uplinks to core *UDLD enforce on uplinks to core ... View more

@Adam Yeah, returning the MX64W and getting the MX64, according to my Korean counterparts (site is in Korea) would take around 2 months. Yep I considered too making a new template to cover the mx64W case. I may not even use a template since the MX64W will be the only one in the organization. given the input from @Mr_IT_Guy, I'll try to use the mx64 template I already have.   Cheers lads ... View more

Thanks @Mr_IT_Guy  So then, if I bind the MX64W to the MX64 template, since the MX64 template has no wireless settings, the mx64W wireless will remain unconfigured. Correct?     ... View more

MerakiDave  Im based in Europe, Amsterdam, The Netherlands to be precise. Are you guys planning to host a Meraki Masters course in this area in the near future?   I'd love to attend if so. ... View more

@MerakiDave Im based in Europe, Amsterdam, The Netherlands to be precise. Are you guys planning to host a Meraki Masters course in this area in the near future?   I'd love to attend if so. ... View more