Hello Meraki Community,  We want to thank you for participating and engaging in Cisco Live’s LABMER-2278, exploring sustainability with Cisco Meraki. Sustainability is at the forefront of business transformation today, and our session is all about making that transition simple and intuitive with Cisco Meraki.  If you have not joined the session, there's still time to do so (Cisco live Amsterdam 2024 from Feb 3rd to Feb 9th). Follow this link to know more and join us at the Walk in Lab area: Cisco Live LABMER-2278    Congratulations to those who have completed this session! We hope you are leaving with more knowledge and ideas for your sustainability journey. Now, we invite you to share your insights, implementations, and future plans with the Meraki community.  We have seen several incredible case studies during this session. Here's a brief summary of each:  Wrexham County Borough Council: Leveraging the Meraki Dashboard's features, they've made significant strides in reducing costs and carbon emissions in their schools. Read More  WPP: Meraki sensors have enabled WPP to cut cooling energy by 44% and total energy consumption by 27% at their London data center, equating to a carbon emission reduction equivalent to planting 1.5 million trees annually. Read More  CAMPUS USA Credit Union: Through Meraki sensors, they've prevented potential damage to their equipment, saving $60,000 and maintaining their commitment to exceptional customer service. Read More  Catena: With Meraki, Catena has streamlined their IT services, reducing travel and costs, and maintaining uninterrupted services at their retail locations. Read More    Whether you've participated in the LABMER-2278 or not, we encourage all members of the Meraki community to join the conversation about sustainability. Your insights, ideas, and experiences are invaluable. Let’s continue to learn, grow, and support one another in our shared goal of a more sustainable future.  ... View more

Comment below with what you think is the correct answer and remember: if you like the question or the ECMS questions initiative, leave a kudo.   See you in a week with the correct answer!   ECMS practice question   Refer to the exhibit. This is the configuration for an SSID to be used as MR Teleworker VPN. Which of the following statements is true regarding clients connecting to an SSID with no firewall & traffic shaping rules and this configuration applied?   Clients connected will be able to communicate with each other Clients with a static IP address will not be able to associate with this SSID Clients connecting to this SSID will receive IP addresses in an isolated 10.0.0.0/8 network Clients traffic with destination IP address 8.8.8.8 will always be sent over the VPN tunnel   P.S. We will be sharing new practice questions weekly! If you'd like to receive updates when we do, click the "ECMS Practice" label below and then "Subscribe”   Here you can find previous questions ... View more

It's Friday again and for this week question we have a "pick 2"!   Comment below with what you think is the correct answer and remember: if you like the question or the ECMS questions initiative, leave a kudo.   See you in a week with the correct answer!   ECMS practice question   Which of the following families of products can leverage the local override functionality when included in a network bound to a template? (Choose 2)   MX Security appliance MV Cameras MT Sensors MG Gateway MR Access point MI Meraki Insight   P.S. We will be sharing new practice questions weekly! If you'd like to receive updates when we do, click the "ECMS Practice" label below and then "Subscribe” Here you can find previous questions ... View more

It is that time of the week, were Friday and the ECMS practice question meet in the Meraki community!   Comment below with what you think is the correct answer and remember: if you like the question or the ECMS questions initiative, leave a kudo.   See you in a week with the correct answer!   ECMS practice question   A customer has 3 MX security appliances deployed in 3 different locations, All the MX’s are in Routed mode and participate in the VPN topology as hubs. MX 1 and MX 2 report no issue in the dashboard, while MX 3 reports a “NAT unfriendly” warning message in the VPN status page. Which of the following might be causing the issue?   MX 1 is behind an upstream device that is rewriting the source port when trying to establishing the VPN tunnel with MX 3 MX 3 is behind an upstream device that is rewriting the destination port when communicating with the two VPN cloud registry MX 3 NAT functionality for the LAN to WAN traffic is not configured properly  MX 3 is behind an upstream device the is rewriting different source port when communicating with the two VPN cloud registry  P.S. We will be sharing new practice questions weekly! If you'd like to receive updates when we do, click the "ECMS Practice" label below and then "Subscribe” Here you can find previous questions ... View more