Hello,   I want to create a new access policy to a switch or a template by API call, using the python library. For this, I am using the following method, found on https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!create-network-switch-access-policy   dashboard.switch.createNetworkSwitchAccessPolicy(networkId=XXXXXXX) I am using it on a switch bind to a template. The problem is : it doesn't seem to create the access policy on the template.    To be sure about it, I have tried with the example on the API V1 documentation :    network_id = 'L_XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX' name = 'Access policy #1' radius_servers = [{'host': '1.2.3.4', 'port': 22, 'secret': 'password1'}] radius_testing_enabled = False radius_coa_support_enabled = False radius_accounting_enabled = True host_mode = 'Single-Host' url_redirect_walled_garden_enabled = True response = dashboard.switch.createNetworkSwitchAccessPolicy( network_id, name, radius_servers, radius_testing_enabled, radius_coa_support_enabled, radius_accounting_enabled, host_mode, url_redirect_walled_garden_enabled, radiusAccountingServers=[{'host': '1.2.3.4', 'port': 22, 'secret': 'password1'}], radiusGroupAttribute='11', accessPolicyType='Hybrid authentication', increaseAccessSpeed=False, guestVlanId=100, voiceVlanClients=True, urlRedirectWalledGardenRanges=['192.168.1.0/24'] ) print(response) (By the way, in the documentation  urlRedirectWalledGardenRanges is a string, but the method needs an array).   When doing so, I get the 201 Created response, but I cannot find this new access policy.   I created two first access policy by hand on the dasboard before trying by API. After trying to create it by API and getting 201 Created, I cannot find it on the dashboard :   On the changelog, I do see POST logs :      But when analyzing it, there is something weird about the values. As you can see, I tried multiple times creating an access policy by API call. Every time I tried, I changed the radius servers to new values (IP and ports). For my last try, I used the code above (the example on API V1 documentation). So, this was the radius server I gave in parameter to the method :  radius_servers = [{'host': '1.2.3.4', 'port': 22, 'secret': 'password1'}]   When checking the logs, there is something weird : it seems like it concatenates my previous radius servers given during my last tries to the new POST : Each blurred host and port was radius servers I previously tried but never at the same time. There are 7 different host in this POST, when I only gave the method 1 radius server (1.2.3.4 port 22).   Also, I cannot find the new access policy when using the get method :  dashboard.switch.getNetworkSwitchAccessPolicies()   I cannot find anything else than my two first access policy created by hand :   Now, when I try to create a new access policy, I get a 500 Internal Server Error message :    I don't have any issue using the other switch access policy methods, the  updateNetworkSwitchAccessPolicy() one works fine on my access policy created by hand.   Does anyone have the same issue as me ? What am I doing wrong ?   Thank you in advance for your answers on my issue ! ... View more

Hello, I am currently working on a simple script that provides a user-friendly interface to automatically modify an entire network static IP devices DNS configuration.   Here is the repository if you want to check it out & test it : https://github.com/ThibautMatzke/meraki-automation-dns On a previous script, I used to test out the api_key validity by using the function meraki.myorgaccess(api_key), but since apiV1, I cannot find any other way than trying to get the organization list with the provided API key.   This is what I currently do :   # Creates a persistent Meraki Dashboard API session with the given api_key self ._dashboard = meraki.DashboardAPI( api_key =api_key) try : # Tries a function to see if the API Key is valid self ._dashboard.organizations.getOrganizations() # Return true the key is valid return True # Catches the error if the API Key isn't valid except meraki.APIError as e: # Prints the error message print (e) # Returns false if the key is invalid return False       Does anyone have a better way of testing an api_key validity ?   Also, I would like to share this script on Cisco Code Exchange, but since I am totally new, do you have any best practices for this ? Should I wait to implement new features before submitting it ?   Thank you in advance for your answers / feedback !   ... View more