Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About jimmyt234
Community Record
137
Posts
193
Kudos
14
Solutions
Badges
Mar 1 2024
12:28 AM
I would go up to .8, not down to .2
... View more
Feb 29 2024
6:21 AM
4 Kudos
+1, I believe locally sourced traffic will not abide by your layer 3 policies.
... View more
Feb 29 2024
5:50 AM
The firmware status for 18.107.x seems broken to me, as if you're running 18.107.2 it will say you're good whereas if you're running anything from .3 - .7 it will say warning/critical because there is a .8 patch available.
... View more
Feb 28 2024
2:42 AM
1 Kudo
We've had 18.208 pushed to a lot of customers and had a myriad of issues which were resolved by rolling back to 18.107.X: - 1:1 NAT issues - non-Meraki VPN peer issues - random reboot issues
... View more
Feb 28 2024
2:39 AM
We've experienced the same problem and had to rollback to 18.107.x
... View more
Feb 26 2024
12:16 AM
3 Kudos
Anyone else getting a new Assurance menu today? Seems to be collating a few bits from under Network-wide...
... View more
Feb 26 2024
12:09 AM
This may do something similar (haven't tried it, so can't verify): Francisco-1088/merakiLifecycleReport - Cisco Code Exchange
... View more
Feb 23 2024
8:05 AM
There is still no way to do this other than the workarounds already discussed.
... View more
Feb 23 2024
2:19 AM
1 Kudo
You can also cancel it completely, rather than keep moving it.
... View more
Feb 23 2024
2:18 AM
1 Kudo
Probably not quite what you're after, and a bit of a hack: but if you've got more than 1 MX in the network then you can configure the VPN client differently on each one and get the specific users only to connect to the relevant MX.
... View more
Feb 23 2024
2:12 AM
2 Kudos
For anyone reading, I have been able to convert the public IP SKU from Basic to Standard by doing the following: Turn off vMX virtual machine Disassociate the public IP from the NIC Set IP assignment type to static from dynamic (this step may or may not be required) Do the upgrade from basic to standard by clicking the banner in Azure Associate IP back to the NIC of the vMX Turn on vMX
... View more
Feb 23 2024
2:10 AM
To expand on this, create a layer 3 outbound firewall policy to block these ports that @RaphaelL says above:
... View more
Feb 23 2024
2:08 AM
2 Kudos
This is a back-end Meraki setting that you will have no visibility of and need to ask Meraki support to set.
... View more
Feb 20 2024
5:50 AM
Did anyone ever sort this? It's just coming across my radar now and we have several deployments for customers that appear to be using the Basic Public IP SKU in Azure.
... View more
Feb 16 2024
1:10 AM
1 Kudo
There is some discussion happening over in this thread: Re: MX 18.208 release being pushed - Performance improvements added to the ... - The Meraki Community
... View more
Feb 15 2024
3:51 AM
It came out with 18.207, the previous stable release candidate version
... View more
Feb 14 2024
11:58 PM
See the FAQ at the bottom of this page: AnyConnect on the MX Appliance - Cisco Meraki Documentation In short, you cannot establish AnyConnect from within the network.
... View more
Jan 24 2024
1:14 AM
Thanks for bringing this back, Ana. Really enjoyed the first series and have signed up for Season 2! 😄
... View more
Dec 1 2023
12:49 AM
What..................................................... I really wish all these secret options they can configure for us is made public knowledge somewhere. How are we supposed to know?!
... View more
Nov 8 2023
6:43 AM
2 Kudos
https://status.meraki.net/incidents/dp7jydl8v5c4 Probably related to this ongoing incident.
... View more
Sep 20 2023
4:32 AM
3 Kudos
I think you'll struggle / experience weird things if you try to have 2 Azure VPN tunnels to the same remote subnet. What you can do, and we have done a lot of, is peer the Azure VPN to the MX's DDNS hostname. This will resolve to the primary uplink IP during normal operation and then if WAN failure it will update and the Azure VPN should re-establish to the other WAN IP. This will be a lot slower and is less elegant and flexible than deploying a vMX, however.
... View more
Sep 8 2023
2:51 AM
In your diagram the offices are connected to the same switches in Area 1 and 2, does that mean they are in the same layer 2 broadcast domain and share the same LAN subnets? If so, you could run the MX105 firewalls in HA, with the one with 2 WAN connections being the primary unit and the other the spare.
... View more
- « Previous
- Next »
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 183 | a week ago | |
| 852 | a month ago | |
| 200 | a month ago | |
| 529 | a month ago | |
| 847 | Sep 6 2024 2:22 AM | |
| 806 | Aug 20 2024 2:50 AM | |
| 1080 | Aug 16 2024 3:57 AM | |
| 438 | Jul 4 2024 3:36 AM | |
| 517 | Jul 2 2024 12:05 AM | |
| 4488 | Jun 4 2024 12:14 AM |
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 285 | |
| 8 | 1080 | |
| 7 | 806 | |
| 6 | 438 | |
| 6 | 517 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
