Meraki

Ryan_Miles · ‎Feb 12 2023

As for why your sensor is going offline, not sure. I'd say open a Support case. I have 31 MTs here. Four are MT14s (all on USB power) with 3 MRs and 15 MVs. I never have sensor issues. But, I also have a lot of gateway redundancy vs a single camera like you have. What is the distance between the MV and MT?

Ryan_Miles · ‎Feb 11 2023

Like this?

Ryan_Miles · ‎Feb 10 2023

The benefit of a template is a single configuration & administration of multiple networks (sites). Doing a template per site would provide no benefit.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Feb 9 2023

Should be yes for US orders (MA-PWR-CORD-US). Anywhere outside of the US it needs to be added manually.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Feb 8 2023

It's all listed here https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Cross-Platform_Content/SFP_and_Stacking_Accessories#Stacking_Cables

Ryan_Miles · ‎Feb 4 2023

Are they quoting CW9166-MR or CW9166-(whatever your reg domain is)? The CW line is universal hardware that can be ordered as a Meraki persona or Catalyst (need WLC) persona. It sounds like maybe they're quoting you WiFi 6 and WiFi 6E APs both Meraki? If they're quoting CW9166 Catalyst mode then obviously you'll need a WLC and have split management between dashboard and WLC/DNAC.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Feb 4 2023

Should be approximately 5 days per the doc. I’d open a case to see why they can find if you’re not seeing that and it was powered for the last 5 days at least.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Feb 3 2023

Support needs to enabled the site to site NAT feature for you. See details HERE.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Feb 3 2023

If you do this make sure you unclaim them from your org. And, the new owner will need to purchase their own licenses. Licenses are not transferable between customers.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Feb 1 2023

Warm Spare and Stacking aren't (can't be) used together. The MS425 supports flexible stacking which means you can make any of the ports stack ports (2 ports max). A stack covers the L3 redundancy that Warm Spare VRRP would do in a non stack capable switch.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Feb 1 2023

Perhaps use IPSK. You could define per client Group Policies which map the SSID to their private VLAN. Then on the common SSID use IPSK so each client has a unique non-shared/known PSK preventing them from accessing another users VLAN. Assuming the 40 VLANs exist on the MX you'd also want firewall rules there to prevent VLAN to VLAN communications.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 31 2023

Can you provide some screenshots of your config? You have a static route on the MX to a destination network and you have a VLAN on the MX configured for DHCP relay to a server in the destination network of that static?

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 31 2023

You should open a Support case

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 30 2023

MX doesn’t support LACP. The recommended topologies are listed here.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 30 2023

Hey, me too. I did F16 Avionics in the USAF back in the 90s. Man, I'm old.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 30 2023

Looking at this Org pretty sure it's exactly this. 8 APs have no tags and all SSIDs are configured to use availability via tags.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 30 2023

We have this bit in documentation. Is it a long shot? Yes probably, but be warned it could happen. From a performance perspective if you have an AP without antennas those ports are still attempting to be used by the radios. Obviously the tx/rx performance will be severely impacted without an antenna. And, with a MIMO AP it's expecting to use all antenna ports. There's no situation in which running with disconnected antenna ports would be the correct way to deploy.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 27 2023

On the traffic shaping page do you have any flow preferences or uplink selection rules set?

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 25 2023

You have 9 Meraki switches in this network. More Meraki switches in another network name that appear to physically be in this same topology with a stack configured as the STP root. And more Catalyst switches, but I'm unsure how those are connected in this topology. It appears perhaps the Catalyst switches sit between two Meraki switch networks? Switch port 28 from your log above reports as connected to a Catalyst 3750. If you've not already done so you should run this by your Meraki TSA for design review. Perhaps there's a STP mode mismatch somewhere in the network path or non matching VLAN configs of ports connecting switches to other switches. Hard to say without a thorough review and access to all configs in this topology.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 25 2023

In your original post, 6th line.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 25 2023

You should never post your Meraki serials on Community (or any public site)

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 23 2023

As the link I posted stated it's expected behavior.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 23 2023

This doesn't work. Mentioned HERE.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 23 2023

This rule needs to say allow for local LAN

Ryan_Miles · ‎Jan 19 2023

The existing switch will be fine. Creating a stack doesn't impact the current config. Note the second switch will require a mgmt IP just like the first switch has today.

About Ryan_Miles

Ryan_Miles

Ryan Miles

Community Record

Badges