Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About pbarbieri
pbarbieri
Here to help
Member since Sep 8, 2019
Dec 11 2020
Community Record
10
Posts
3
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Dec 11 2020
8:07 AM
It is absurd that Cisco is not able to remove this issue ... many time i have to open a ticket to ask to fix the problem in the backend... this solution is become unreliable. I have more than 7 meraki w64 hub and spoke architecture for a mission critical application and cisco do not release a firmware to remove it. Mainly this happens as soon as power go off and meraki start again without a warm reboot and i noted that in the previous firmware release this didnt happen.
... View more
Nov 16 2020
8:02 PM
Dns is always the same when it run. I dont understand why you justify a problem worldwide . This happens and only them can fix. Id for same rason meraki restart the problem come out and no way to resolve. Only configuring another meraki and substitute it with the fear that the problem come out again
... View more
Nov 16 2020
7:58 PM
This cant be true because meraki run means that this port is unblocked . After a meraki restart ot other issue the meraki enter in one state wherenis impossible to fetch configuration and finish only they can unblock the situation. I have this problem since one month four times. They said a new release will be ready and beta has . This problem is very severe and compromise the cloud management
... View more
Nov 16 2020
7:51 PM
The same for me unable to fetch configuration. I had this problem four time in one month. They said that is needed a new release of firmware and the beta has. Imagine i use meraki for a mission critical application
... View more
Sep 30 2019
1:27 AM
Hello, I have a cloud of meraki MX64 one hub three spokes. do you believe that when there is a Meraki (AMP, signature or other) from the cloud the uplink traffic is delayed? I tested that are not the server provider and the packet latency between auto VPN nodes remail very low. The feeling is like if the meraki is busy to do other and cloud is not able to get information or really it delays packets for few seconds of this uplink traffic to the clients. (annexed the effect) meraki uplink gap in the photo the primary link (management) is the WAN2 the other service provider didnt produce this effect. thx!
... View more
Sep 29 2019
1:57 AM
Good morning, I have a network with several meraki MX64. I have enabled autovpn hub and spoke configuration between the nodes, with one hub and three spokes. in one meraki node one of these subnet (10.11.8.x/24) that take part to the auto-VPN tunnels have two static routes with subnet 10.11.3x/24 and 10.11.2.x/24 and 10.11.8.1 as gateway . I have configured the static routing enabling the VPN options for the subnet 10.11.3.x/24 and 10.11.2.x/24. My question is : if I have already enabled the VPN option for 10.11.8.x Do I have to set the VPN option also for the subnet 10.11.3x/24 and 10.11.2.x/24 that have a static routing with 10..11.8.1? What does It happen if I don't apply this option? Static routing Subnet Gateway 10.11.3.0/24 10.11.8.1 10.11.2.0/24 10.11.8.1 10.11.8.0/24 VPN enabled Thanks
... View more
Sep 8 2019
3:21 AM
Hello, I would like to know if a Meraki MX64W connectivity test fail (or on 8.8.8.8 or other address) can impact on the existing packet latency. I noted that when I receive lost packet due to the connectivity ping fail, my traffic is delayed until 3 seconds and this cause timeout on my end to end Auto VPN application. The VPNs remain stable, not disconnection or route changing , but sometime traffic has been delayed . Could it have sense?
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 14663 | |
| 1 | 1962 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
