Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About hilehoffer
hilehoffer
Here to help
Member since Nov 17, 2017
May 26 2021
Community Record
12
Posts
2
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Apr 2 2019
3:56 PM
Just had issue where enabling amp caused Netflix to break on XBOX and PS4. Running 14.39, soon as I turned amp off, the issue was resolved.
... View more
Aug 31 2018
8:46 AM
Can an MX64 vs MX65 form an AutoVPN over the backup cellular connection? Can an MX67C use the CAT6 LTE as a primary WAN Uplink?
... View more
Aug 31 2018
6:48 AM
One other thing to note, the MX 250s run better on the 14 code. I know it is beta, but I think that train got started to better support the MX 250/450 line.
... View more
Aug 31 2018
6:47 AM
In my case we did not actually do a warm spare just Data Center redundancy. I think our issue may finally have been resolved, we had a firmware upgrade that did not actually complete on one of the MX 250s even though dashboard said it did. We did a factory default and let it do its thing from scratch and the issue resolved itself. We may have also had an issue with DHCP, I thought the MX already had a static IP address. For your case, I would make your backup the mater, and then factory reset the other one, and see if it resolves the issue. And definitely make sure you have a support case open.
... View more
Aug 27 2018
10:20 AM
They are also sending around 700 BGP routes to the Data Center appliances.
... View more
Aug 27 2018
10:19 AM
Customer really wants to do BGP as the they have MX 250s as one armed hubs in 2 data centers.
... View more
Aug 27 2018
9:23 AM
Working with a customer to implement SD WAN using MX 250s asone armed hubs in their data centers, and I was wondering if any has had issues with the MX 250s randomly going offline. We are on beta code and trying out BGP, and I am concerned about the stability of the platform. Also would like to know if anyone had any failed MX250s following a firmware update? In our case one of the 2 DC MX250s failed appears to have failed a couple weeks ago following an upgrade to 14.31 and has not recovered yet. Meraki support has first recommended a physical power cycle wich we have not done. I noticed the other MX250 just went offline today.
... View more
Nov 30 2017
11:29 AM
I am working with an MX 100 that has been configured in One Armed Mode behind a Checkpoint Firewall, with Hide Behind Nat. The MX is unable to form autovpn connections, NAT type: Unfriendly. This security appliance is behind a VPN-unfriendly NAT, which can be caused by upstream load balancers or strict firewall rulesThat is the message from the VPN status page. Not sure what would be causing this on the Checkpoint.
... View more
Nov 30 2017
6:27 AM
Usually to provide SD WAN you would have an MX in one armd mode at HQ. In your environment I would try connecting WAN 2 to MPLS and then it should be fine for all the MX appliances to NAT. The autovpn will form an overlay on the MPLS network. You should not need additional routers. In this setup your MPLS provider will not need any lknowledge of your internal networks, as they will be nat'd via the MXs.
... View more
Nov 17 2017
8:55 AM
2 Kudos
From the clients page, there is the option to add a column called capabilities, then you can sort from there. . .
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4437 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
