- About Phil_SCDS
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Phil_SCDS
Here to help
Member since May 21, 2019
07-08-2019
Community Record
18
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
06-28-2019
06:36 AM
Hi BrechtSchamp, I can't configure the connection myself so I only have the end users word that they have followed the instructions. I will ask them to check again though. Many thanks, Phil
... View more
06-28-2019
06:34 AM
Hi SoCalRacer, I will double check on the windows version type, they tend to take a while to get back to me so watch this space. Many thanks, Phil
... View more
06-28-2019
06:32 AM
Hi Nash, I don't have access to the machine in question, I can only pass on instructions and hope for the best. I don't believe there is more than 1 username on the machine in question. I can connect to the vpn using their credentials. Many thanks, Phil
... View more
06-28-2019
06:31 AM
Hi Uberseehandel, Thanks for your reply, unfortunately the machine belongs to the end user and is outside of my remit. Many thanks, Phil
... View more
06-27-2019
08:11 AM
Hi All, I have setup a client VPN connecting into an MX84 router. For the majority of users this is working absolutely fine. However, one user running windows 7 is experiencing error 741 when trying to connect. This is the error for their computer not supporting the data encryption type. My question is: what is the data encryption type. This page: https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Client_VPN/Client_VPN_Overview Suggests that it is using 3DES, AES128 and SHA1 but SHA1 is no longer supported by Microsoft so it seems unlikely that this is still in use. Does anyone know if this is still correct or if it has changed and the documentation is simply out of date? If so what is the current encryption type? Many thanks, Phil
... View more
06-06-2019
08:21 AM
SoCalRacer, Thank you that was it, there was a random layer 3 wireless firewall rule blocking access to the local LAN. Must be a default policy because I hadn't set it. Thanks again, Phil
... View more
06-06-2019
01:33 AM
Hi rbnielsen, DHCP is running on a windows server, the WiFi clients get an IP address from this server fine. I have tried changing the port the AP is connected to in access of trunk mode. I have tried turning VLAN tagging on but I wasn't too sure which VLAN(s) to add to it - should it be the client VLAN, the server VLAN or both? Many thanks, Phil
... View more
06-05-2019
08:55 AM
Out of interest is the cisco WiFi also 5GHz, have you tried forcing the Meraki to only broadcast 2.4GHz and see if it is any better? Also I assume you have used a channel scanning piece of software to see if there is anything using the same channels that might possibly interrupt your connection (grasping at straws I know)?
... View more
06-05-2019
08:48 AM
I have done this before with MR16s, MR18s and MR20s. It works fine. Access points in general are somewhat directional so with them pointing at the floor you probably will not get the best coverage, however if it is your only option and you have enough points to cover the area needed then it will work. Phil
... View more
06-05-2019
08:45 AM
Hi All, I have a network setup where there are 2 VLANs. The servers are on 118 and the clients are on 128. The server ports on the MS120 are set to trunk mode and all the other ports are access on 128. Clients connected directly into the switch work fine. I have a single MR20 that is broadcasting an SSID in bridge mode. I can connect to the WiFi network fine and I am even getting an IP address from the server on VLAN 118 (so DHCP is working). However if I try to ping the server address or the domain name I get: REPLY FROM 10.128.128.128: destination net unreachable. Any ideas as to how I make the wireless clients communicate with the network properly? The router on this network is an MX84 which relays DHCP requests to the server on VLAN 118.
... View more
05-22-2019
12:43 AM
Hi Sascha, Thanks for trying, I did see the same conclusion on a different forum but your explanation is much clearer, thank you for taking the time. Phil
... View more
05-21-2019
08:36 AM
Hi el_pajaro_bobo, Thank you so much for all your help. This really helping to clear things up. In my case the addresses that the spoke site (mx68) is trying to reach are internet addresses not local networks. The hub site has an NHS broadband connection and the addresses are only available via this. On the mx84 there are traffic shaping rules to make sure that clients trying to access the NHS services use the NHS broadband (wan2 in this case). I would assume from your instructions that I could create a static route on the spoke (mx68) saying NHS traffic go to the mx84. However if I enter an internal IP address of the mx84 into the static route on the spoke router then it says the next hop address is invalid. Can I create static routes to the other MXs inside the auto vpn, or does this need to be done from the destination router so the mx84 in this case? Thanks again, Phil
... View more
05-21-2019
07:19 AM
I think I worked out what you mean by "VPN marker". When I try to add a vlan for the destination network it wants me to add an ip for the mx, the router doesn't have an ip on this range so I am unsure what I should add. Thanks for your time.
... View more
05-21-2019
07:03 AM
Also, I assume I am adding the subnets from the spoke site (MX68) to the subnets section under addressing and vlans?
... View more
05-21-2019
07:01 AM
Hi el_pajaro_bobo, This sounds promising, I shall give this a go and report back. Could you clarify what you mean by "VPN marker"? Many thanks, Phil
... View more
05-21-2019
06:27 AM
Hi MarcP, Thanks for your reply. Flow preferences seem to only allow you to select wan 1 or wan 2 as the route for the traffic. I can't see a way to say specific traffic only uses the VPN. Unless I am missing something. The screen shot below shows that the preferred uplink is only wan1 or wan2. If there was an option there for vpn then I think it would work.
... View more
05-21-2019
04:26 AM
Hello, I have 2 sites connected to each other currently using the auto-vpn functionality. The Hub is running an MX84 and the Spoke an MX68. Due to the nature of the internet usage some traffic has to be routed to the hub site while the rest is normal internet usage. Currently I have it set up at the spoke site to use the hub as a default route as I cannot seem to route traffic destined for specific IP addresses only through the VPN. The issue with this is that all internet traffic is sent over the VPN and it has cut download speeds in half. Ideally I want to set up routes for traffic that is only trying to reach specific IP addresses to be sent to the hub site. I understand that this might not be possible with the auto-vpn and that I may have to set up a site to site vpn manually. I am happy to do this if it solves my issue but I need to know how to set up the static routes once the non-meraki site-to-site vpn is in place. Thanks
... View more
