Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About Sistemas_SLG
Sistemas_SLG
Here to help
Member since Jan 23, 2019
Mar 21 2019
Community Record
15
Posts
2
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Mar 15 2019
5:26 AM
Thank you very much everyone for your answers and comments! Until a next opportunity... Regards!
... View more
Mar 14 2019
1:24 PM
In the same way I did some tests moving around between days close to the week and between one day and another it changes from straight peaks to erratic peaks. It would be to wait to see who else gives us an answer or it would be on this side. Thank you!
... View more
Mar 14 2019
12:56 PM
I understand what you tell me, but when returning several weeks ago the behavior of the graphics are like that of week 1, in addition to this just before starting week 2 of February 18, the changes mentioned above were made. That's why I assume it's not just a coincidence. Anyway many cries for their answers!
... View more
Mar 14 2019
12:37 PM
If I go several weeks and even months back the graphs always have the same pattern of week 1, and after week 2 that I mention they all stayed with that pattern of erratic peaks.
... View more
Mar 14 2019
12:24 PM
Greetings members of the community! I have a particular doubt that I have not been able to resolve. It turns out that in the "Organization / Summary report" section, the "Usage over time" graphs appear. If I take 2 weeks where week 1 had wireless connectivity problems and week 2 were all problems solved; Why is it that the graph that corresponds to week 2 the peaks are more erratic where everything worked correctly? Basically the changes that were made were of policies in the different VLANs, all APs were placed in an exclusive VLAN for them with their respective policies, unnecessary SSIDs were removed in the different APs, a large number of clients were placed in a SSID in NAT mode with its own policies. I remain attentive to any collaboration and thank you very much! Week 1 week 2
... View more
Feb 18 2019
4:13 AM
Thank you very much for the information and your help. I will make the revisions and any news I will tell you. Regards!
... View more
Feb 15 2019
12:50 PM
It works if I access a network segment within the local network infrastructure, but outside with the external link it simply tells me that the site is not available.
... View more
Feb 15 2019
10:24 AM
Hello to all the members of the community. Currently, I have been witnessing certain power losses in the wireless signal, most of all in the AP MR 26. For example, if a client has always been at the same distance from the AP and a few days ago received 5 lines of wireless signal, at this time only receives 1 or 2 signal lines. I have also seen that different clients, for example, in short periods of time go from having 5 signal lines to only 1 and in the opposite way. I assume it's an AP problem but I'm not sure. Has someone else happened to you? Any possible solution? Thank you very much to all!
... View more
Feb 15 2019
10:10 AM
Actually the address 181.129.128.2 is associated with the fiber service in a channel towards WAN2. The public server would be associated with the address 181.129.128.3. As for the static configuration of the WAN ports, they have already been configured as seen in the image. It's more now that I think about it, the error comes from before the MX re-establishment. Now I could not assure you that the problem comes from bad configuration of WAN ports. I am attentive to some guide to solve my problem .... Thank you!
... View more
Feb 15 2019
7:54 AM
Hello to the whole community! Recently because of a problem in the MX100, a reset had to be made by means of the front button. The WAN1 and WAN2 networks were configured with their respective ip address to the 2 fiber channels associated with the internet service provider but on the contrary as it had been operating previously (WAN1 181.129.128.2) (WAN2 190.0.53.2). I do not know if it is because of that that my web server that should operate as external does not work anymore. Could you please guide me to re-establish the server's external connection? Thank you very much and see you soon!
... View more
Feb 15 2019
6:42 AM
Ok, thank you very much for your collaboration!
... View more
Feb 6 2019
10:28 AM
Hello again! I am already looking at the issue of group policies at different levels and with regard to the "Priority Order" also in order to have clarity on the subject. As for the URL item "Category list size" in "Content filtering" this is currently enabled the option "Complete list" as they mention me. Now the specific issue is that apparently the changes are not taking them to change from one policy to another, but that the client is in a different state of policy and appears visually as "Normal" is actually with the old policy. Proof of that was that in the categories of the old policy add the item "Adult and pornography" and automatically the content was restricted. I thank you for all the responses generated. But now I'm also worried about the violation that policies can receive with the use of proxy-type Chrome extensions like "UltraSurf Security, Privacy & Unblock VPN" and the private browser "Tor"???? According to the tests I did, with these tools, no policy seems to have an effect on the MX. I thank you all for your cooperation! Regards
... View more
Feb 5 2019
4:20 PM
Hello to the whole community! I currently have a problem on the dashboard platform and would like to know if someone could help me please? The policies that I have configured for the "Security-appliance" network are not working in terms of group policies. As an example I have the team "SALA3-PC21" which has a group policy called "G_VLAN8", which restricts access to adult content pages according to the category "Adult and pornography" but from that team access to that type of pages is free. Actually I do not really know what configuration should be used for the policies to work correctly within the "Security-appliance" network. If someone could give me some advice, it would be very helpful. I attach images of the situation: I would greatly appreciate any collaboration.
... View more
Jan 23 2019
11:38 AM
2 Kudos
Thank you very much for answering! Indeed, a firewall rule that referred to that subnet, did not exist in the MX. When the rule or policy is erased, changes are being made normally on the platform. With respect to the subnet addresses and their reservation, I will have to create new ranges to correct the ones I had to erase. Greetings and a thousand thanks again!
... View more
Jan 23 2019
7:56 AM
Hello to the whole community! I currently have a problem with the Cisco Meraki Dashboard platform, when I try to modify an item in the DHCP section and also in the Group Policies section. I associate this problem with the modification of any VLAN since an error message appears when trying to modify any mentioned element. It is worth mentioning that I have a Meraki MX-100. Below is the image of the error so that please guide me in solving the problem. I appreciate your cooperation!
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2483 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
