Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- About AbbyDoc-UK
Community Record
13
Posts
7
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
07-27-2022
05:57 AM
2 Kudos
@cmr yes that will work too thanks. Do you mean the importance of what device is connected to each switch?
... View more
07-27-2022
05:16 AM
@cmr thanks for the suggestion. How does the below look? 1st Floor 1 x RPS C3K-PWR-750WAC each with one 750 PS 4 x Cisco Meraki MS225-48-HW 1 x RPS C3K-PWR-750WAC each with one 750 PS 2 x Cisco Meraki MS225-48-HW 2 x Cisco Meraki MS225-24-HW 1 x RPS C3K-PWR-750WAC each with two 750 PS 2 x Cisco Meraki MS225-24P-HW 2nd Floor 2 x RPS C3K-PWR-750WAC each with two 750 PS 4 x Cisco Meraki MS225-48-HW 1 x Cisco Meraki MS225-24P-HW
... View more
07-26-2022
03:05 PM
@cmr based on the below power load and the fact that the RPS can support up to 6 devices at once providing redundancy for up to two at a time depending on configuration I am thinking. 1st Floor 2 x RPS C3K-PWR-750WAC each with one 750 PS 6 x Cisco Meraki MS225-48-HW 2 x Cisco Meraki MS225-24-HW 1 x RPS C3K-PWR-750WAC each with two 750 PS 2 x Cisco Meraki MS225-24P-HW 2nd Floor 2 x RPS C3K-PWR-750WAC each with two 750 PS 4 x Cisco Meraki MS225-48-HW 1 x Cisco Meraki MS225-24P-HW We will have additional redundancy such has further connecting the RPSs to UPS and independent AC sources.
... View more
07-25-2022
05:44 PM
HI, I am looking at using the Cisco Redundant Power System 2300 as redundant PS for some MS 255 switches but not sure which of the two configuration models (C3K-PWR-1150WAC or C3K-PWR-750WAC) to use and how many switches each will support? Rack one (Separate Floor) 6 x Cisco Meraki MS225-48-HW 2 x Cisco Meraki MS225-24-HW 2 x Cisco Meraki MS225-24P-HW Rack Two (Separate Floor) 4 x Cisco Meraki MS225-48-HW 1 x Cisco Meraki MS225-24P-HW Regards, Abby
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Other
07-11-2022
05:30 AM
2 Kudos
@DarrenOC The physical stack has been removed in the new drawing and as you rightly observed, we will be using the uplinks between both switches at the core. Again, you are right, we have been discussing the idea of having dual uplinks between each access switch and the core. Thanks.
... View more
07-11-2022
04:09 AM
2 Kudos
This is going to be very cool and the fact that their APs to match will be a game changer in deploying Catalyst especially to multiple branches.
... View more
07-11-2022
03:54 AM
Hi, in the attached diagram I am wondering if stacking and uplinking the stacked switches is valid configuration? Regards
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Topology
07-01-2022
11:02 AM
Thank you all for the great replies. They are informative. At least I know I am on the right path. I did not mention this in my original post, but the environment needs to be reliable and highly available as it's being deployed in a country where there is wild fluctuation in power as well as power cuts. In addition, we are deploying a heavy AV infrastructure on one of the floors that includes devices like the Crestron NVX and others, as well as streaming devices and lots of meeting rooms. The idea is to directly connect the AV racks to the core/aggregation switch with LAG to provide redundancy other than that of the AV switch stack.
... View more
06-30-2022
04:19 PM
Hello, My client has requested an all-Meraki solution for their network, Firewall, Switches, APs, and Cameras. The network comprises of about 400 wired LAN ports for Data, Voice and Telephony and about another 50 for APs. No servers on site and user traffic will be directed towards the internet. I was looking at 2 x MX 250 High Availability, 2 x MS 450 Aggregation switches High Availability (thinking deploying MS425 as core/aggregation) and 4 x MS 355 x2 Stacked (access layer) High Availability Stack. I am not sure what Meraki Switch to use for my High Availability Core switches. Can anyone please make some suggestions? Regards, AbbyDoc
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
