Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Become a member of the Cisco Meraki Community today
Get answers from our community of experts in record time.
Join now- About Dan91
About Dan91
Dan91
Here to help
Member since Nov 11, 2024
Friday
Community Record
11
Posts
1
Kudos
1
Solution
Badges
2 weeks ago
Yes, I am aware of that thank you. I did this on a mx-67c model. So I was hoping it was possible on the MX85.
... View more
2 weeks ago
So, we are unable to convert a LAN port to be a WAN port. Is that correct?
... View more
2 weeks ago
Hello, I have an MX85 currently setup with ports as follows... Current setup: Under WAN - GbE - WAN3 is primary Internet, WAN4 is the failover using the Meraki MG21E-NA (Cellular Gateway). Desired setup: Under WAN - GbE - WAN3 as primary Internet, WAN4 - secondary - failover to Starlink, set up LAN port 5 as WAN5 (Tertiary) failover to the MG21E-NA Cellular Gateway. The question is, is this possible? Thanks for any answers to this question! Dan Picture below shows WAN3 and WAN4 as the current setup. LAN port 7 is the downlink to our LAN switch.
... View more
Mar 5 2025
8:59 AM
That is what I expected after reading through the docs and looking at another post in the community forums. I have put in a ticket with Meraki/Cisco just to be sure. Thanks for the response!
... View more
Mar 5 2025
8:39 AM
Hello, Simple question. Are we able to allow a company's remote site in another country (for example country name - TEST) assuming we can get their external static IP address, while at the same time blocking country - TEST via the Layer 7 Firewall rules section? We have a 1:1 NAT rule for the website set up that allows 'any' remote IP. But the a company site in the country TEST cannot hit our website. My initial research says this may not be possible, though I may be overlooking something. Thanks for any information you provide! MX Layer 7 Deny Countries rules
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Firewall
Jan 14 2025
7:00 AM
1 Kudo
We have fully migrated over to the MX and have DHCP to the phones working. for Time offset for Central we had to use the integer: -21600 And for NTP we used IP addresses pointing to Internet based NTP servers.
... View more
Nov 11 2024
10:51 AM
Yes. When I had them getting DHCP from the MX, I was able to have a phone pick up DHCP. So the IP phones are getting an IP address via DHCP but aren’t picking up any of the scope options. Yes, DHCP from the Meraki, though no options were handed out. Did you remove the L3 interface off the 3850 whilst testing? Yes, had the L3 interface removed from the 3850. Factory reset of the ip phone? Maybe try clearing the ARP cache on the 3850 also? Factory reset may be a good call. This was about a month ago so I cannot recall if I did or not. Time offset - option 2 was forcing an integer and NTP is forcing an IP address or maybe a hostname will work. Not working on this at the moment but will review later when the opportunity arises.
... View more
Nov 11 2024
7:39 AM
We are migrating to a Meraki MX105. It is up and running and is our current edge router although the L3 routing is currently on our C3850 L3 switches. I would like to migrate the voice VLAN to the MX105. My question is about the DHCP options. I have option 42 for NTP and option 2 for time offset both working in the DHCP scopes on the Cisco C3850 switches. I was able to get DHCP flowing from the MX but unsuccessful in getting the DHCP options 42 and 2 to work from the MX. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Other
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1979 | Jan 14 2025 7:00 AM |
© 2025 Cisco Systems, Inc.
