Meraki

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 14 2017

Identity should be their email address. Leave "anonymous identity" blank. Password should be there password. Make sure their account is "authorised". I found this guide on how to set it up. https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/Encryption_and_Authentication/WPA2_Enterprise_Profile_Setup_on_Android

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 14 2017

I don't think this is likely. With the Amazon and Azure products the Meraki "Intellectual Property" is protected. You can get at or see the raw disks (or the machines) to get the intellectual property. If it was on a private VMWare server you could ...

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 14 2017

If you have no VPNs configured then you don't have an issue. If you are only using AutoVPN you don't have an issue. If you are using either client to site VPN or a third party site to site IPSec VPN then you have an issue. The only "fix" you have to use is to make sure you are using a long hard pre-shared key. Personally - I use 24 character pre-shared keys. This will mitigate the risk - but the PCI report will still say the same as it wont know you are using a PSK that is nor practically break-able.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 14 2017

Have you tried the beta firmware? It may be that the issues you opened the ticket about have been resolved in them.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 14 2017

Make sure the date and time on the machine are correct.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 14 2017

If you want to be able to deploy apps without user intervention on Android you must put the device into Device Owner mode. https://documentation.meraki.com/SM/Deployment_Guides/Android_Enterprise_Deployment_Guide_(Android_for_Work) If you think this is tricky - wait till you have to do an Apple device.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 13 2017

I think I have figured this out. Set the phase 2 authentication to MSCHAPv2.,

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 13 2017

I have not seen this happen myself - unless there really is an IP address conflict. I assume there is no chance there are two DHCP servers on the LAN? Are both devices configured to use DHCP, or is one/both using a static IP address?

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 13 2017

Negative, the Cisco "Support Forums" are on Lithium as well and they don't have the same limitations .

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 13 2017

If you think my response helped it would be great if you could give me some Kudos and mark my answer as correct.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 13 2017

Did you make those three ports on the MS220 access ports?

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 13 2017

You can also say to create the new network by copy the existing network.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 13 2017

Is Samsung cloud an actual app? Do you think you could find its ID? It may be that it is being caught by some other restriction.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 13 2017

I noticed that usernames are very restrictive as well. My surname has an apostrophe in it and I couldn't enter that either.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 13 2017

You are correct, It is software limited to that maximum speed. To support Gigabit you would need to jump all the way up to an MX250. https://meraki.cisco.com/products/appliances/mx250 An MX100 can do 750Mb/s. https://meraki.cisco.com/products/appliances/mx100

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 12 2017

If this is an App you should be able to push it out. I have not seen any options for selecting or configuring a keyboard.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 12 2017

Scratch that, I was wrong. https://documentation.meraki.com/zGeneral_Administration/Licensing/Licensing_Guidelines_and_Limitations "Note: The organization co-termination date does not depend on the current device count, but rather the license limit. Removing devices from a network or organization will not impact the co-termination date"

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 12 2017

Multi-year licences have pretty good discounts, so you probably have not lost out that bad over buying annual licencing. I don't know this for sure, but due to the way licences are weighted I would try removing the MX's from your organisation inventory all together. Note your overall end licence date before and after. It might stretch the date afterwards due to the weighting.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 12 2017

Check out this post as well. https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/wireless-ip-voice-and-video/ascom-wifi-phone-problems/td-p/1589289

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 12 2017

As I understand it, those phones don't support 802.11r, so you will have issues anytime they roam from one access point to another.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 12 2017

I don't know the answer, but I would have thought it should be using PEAP rather than TTLS.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 12 2017

I tried this with the beta firmware 13.22 and it did the same thing as well (allow ping traffic to the MX interface).

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 11 2017

Negative @MilesMeraki. Creating an organisation does not ask you anything about location.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 11 2017

I don't know this answer 100%. I know that it is located in multiple Amazon AWS availability zones, and also in Cisco Meraki data centres. I know that a big chunk is in the Amazon AWS East Coast region. I understand it is also in other regions.

PhilipDAth · ‎Sep 11 2017

Negative to @kruse on (3). If you make the vMX100 a hub the traffic for AWS will go directly to AWS. It will not flow via the hub.

About PhilipDAth

PhilipDAth

Philip D'Ath

Community Record

Badges