@tantony wrote: Yes, that's the correct URL, but my browser auto completes it to the link on my post.   Just because your browser is auto-completing it doesn't mean it is right. Mearki.com is not correct.  ... View more

Maybe try the correct URL?   http://dashboard.meraki.com ... View more

@Neil_mack To answer your question, no it does not cache https. It can't as the MX doesn't do SSL decryption.  ... View more

I'm with @NolanHerring and @Ben . I don't get why you would use this feature. Even the documentation for it is weird...   https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Firewall_and_Traffic_Shaping/SD-WAN_and_Traffic_Shaping#Web_cache   First it says "This option is not available on the MX60, MX60W, MX64, MX64W, MX65, MX65W, MX67, MX67W, MX67C, MX68, MX68W, MX68CW, Z1, Z3, or Z3C devices."   Then is says "This feature is recommended only for sites with limited bandwidth. Locations with over 20 Mbps bandwidth will likely not benefit from content caching."   In what universe would I have not the smallest MX connected to a <20Mbps service? ... View more

I don't think I ever did this on the original thread...   A bit about yourself & your work I've been doing Enterprise networking for 15 years now. Currently I design and develop products for our Business side of the house based on the Meraki platform. I'm not naming my employer as I post here as me, and only me 🙂    If you really want to know who I work for find me on LinkedIn.   Your experience with Cisco Meraki 2 years now working almost exclusively with Meraki. In my current role we use everything except the SM lineup.    A fun fact about yourself I dislike talking about myself 😛 ... View more

@NolanHerring wrote: Turn off loadbalancing. that slower DSL sounds like the purpose is for redundancy. I would only use load-balance if you have two good/fast pipes And to add to that, if you're going to use load balancing then you really should make sure the bandwidth settings for the links are set correct at the top of the Trafic Shaping page. This way traffic is balanced proportionally to the bandwidth available for each link.     ... View more

You can set which is primary under the Security > Configure > Traffic Shaping page. There's a drop down to specify WAN1 or WAN2. ... View more

Sorry, ignore the convert the port comment. MX68 has 2 WAN ports. My bad. ... View more

You'll need to convert one of the LAN ports to a WAN port in the local status page. Everything else should just work. ... View more

@Twitch I just emailed my Meraki Account team (also the sales team) and said I am interested in participating in the ECMS2 if there's a slot available. No idea if it'll get me a slot or not, but at least the ask is in with them.  ... View more

...And my sales team has officially been harassed about the ECMS2 🙂     ... View more

Yeh I figured Meraki Support would have caught that if you hadn't. But never hurts to check.   In this case I'd be leaning into Meraki support to troubleshoot. You have no visibility into what's going wrong so it's up to them to tell you what is broken. Don't let them off the hook that easily 🙂 ... View more

You have to re-enable VPN when you do a hardware swap. Did you do that under Security > Configure > Site to site VPN? ... View more

Thanks for the swanky backpack @CarolineS and @MeredithW !   ... View more

If I ever thought there was any possibility I would maybe one day get the top spot the recent appearance of @BrechtSchamp , and what seems to be a renewed effort by @PhilipDAth, combining for a simply mind-boggling amount of kudos firmly reassures me that I'm never, ever going to achieve that 😛   I clearly can't even keep up with the modest, but not to be understated, level @NolanHerring operates at.    Well done gentlemen! ... View more

Congrats guys! ... View more

No, not quite. An MX will forward EVERY BPDU out every port. It doesn't listen for STP, so it doesn't act on it at all. You can literally think of the MX as a dumb hub when it come to STP.    My explanation above was somewhat simpllified, and the arrows really show it more as if we were dealing with 802.1d. Since we're actually dealing with 802.1w there's actually an exchange of BPDUs on each link between adjacent switches, so the arrows would actually be a real mess if I was to draw everything. The good news here though is that 802.1w is meant to act much like 802.1d with regards to how decisions are made for blocked ports, so I can draw things in that manner and the concepts apply.    So, if you go with an MX will forward a received BPDU out all ports, and all other rules for root and blocked port decisions apply, you should end up in the right place.  ... View more

The MX cannot be a RADIUS server. It would be external to the MX. You could run it on a dedicated server, or on one of your DC's if you wanted. The Microsoft role for RADIUS you would add is Network Policy Server(NPS).  ... View more

One note about that example... It's an old diagram I had lying around and shows the MX's directly connected to each other  (heartbeat cable). That link is no longer considered best practice so it should not actually ever be used.  ... View more