Yeah so that is from my house, so the only rules applying there are ZOOM marking them which it is doing. In the office doing a packet capture from the firewall for wireless clients I don't see any tags or I see all (CS7) 56 which is just odd. So I figured Meraki must be doing something nefarious because on the backbone we are just trusting the tags and prioritizing traffic based on them.
Below is from the firewall for a wireless client at the office and all their traffic towards the internet. You can see all this users traffic is tagged as CS7 and we see the complete opposite from other users with 0 tags whatsoever.
I wanted to be sure that if Meraki does see those tags it doesn't limit bandwidth to them. So that is where the traffic shaping rules came into play and how to best ensure we had them configured correctly. When checking all the moving parts we are seeing odd behavior and not sure what is causing it.
Make a long story short we are tagging traffic from ZOOM and we aren't seeing those tags applied correctly to wireless clients. We know those clients can send/receive those tags because we see them outside the office, why inside the office we don't see the same behavior is the unknown.
Do you know if I specify a localsubnet on a rule will Meraki tag all packets on that subnet that match the ports I have defined on that same rule? Its just not clear on what exactly those definitions are doing.
Let me see if I can decipher what wired office clients are doing.