Meraki Early Access Program: AP Zero Touch Deployment

Solved
RWelch
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Meraki Early Access Program: AP Zero Touch Deployment

AP Zero Touch Deployment

Simplify AP deployments with automated, one-click provisioning.

If you found this post helpful, please give it Kudos. If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
1 Accepted Solution
AlexanderN
Meraki Employee All-Star Meraki Employee All-Star
Meraki Employee All-Star

IMO, this feature will have a big positive impact to make AP RMA and new deployment more seamless. Will it solve for every possible corner case like SecurePort? Of course not! However, we can always make MVP+ additional later.

 

Free free to submit enhancement requests via https://ciscospinfra.ideas.aha.io/

View solution in original post

8 Replies 8
DarrenOC
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Never convinced by zero touch deployments.  Pre-staging has been ingrained in me. Equipment may be more reliable and robust nowadays but I like the assurance that the eqpt I’m deploying works and I’ve witnessed that.

Darren OConnor | doconnor@resalire.co.uk
https://www.linkedin.com/in/darrenoconnor/

I'm not an employee of Cisco/Meraki. My posts are based on Meraki best practice and what has worked for me in the field.
Mloraditch
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

I remember hearing about this at either Cisco Live or a partner training, It appears you have to load the new aps and then match them up, which is fine, but I'd prefer to  have them pre-loaded and just rely on matching up serials as an option, then things could happen automatically as soon as they are plugged in.

I can see why you might want the other way, but having both would be ideal imo.

If you found this post helpful, please give it Kudos. If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
RaphaelL
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

I really love the idea , but I'm afraid the limitations might kill the hype.

 

1- Does it work with SecurePort ? SecurePort requires that the AP is in the same network as the switches

2- Can it support a more complexe naming scheme ?  Our APs do not end with the SEQ number. AP + Unique LOC ( 3 letters ) + Floor ( 2 Chars ) + SEQ ( 2 Chars ) + ZZ

MinseK
Meraki Employee
Meraki Employee

Thanks @RaphaelL for feedbacks! definitely we can add SecurePort scenario support in next iterations. ther e are even more exciting list of features being discussed on AP ZTD solution and looking forward to support broader deployment scenarios!
in terms of AP naming support, yes I think there are huge room for improvements. Adding RegX expression is one of topic that we've been tinking but it also comes with some complexity too.  one idea to overcome that is using API!  AP ZTD operations are fully API ready and customer can add more complex rule in AP naming 

RaphaelL
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Wow that would be perfect ! 

 

Naming the AP via API sounds excellent too. Thanks for the follow up !

alemabrahao
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Interesting.

For the environments where I have the C9800, I use regular expressions to apply tags to the Access Points. This way, the only work I have to do is rename the APs, and as soon as it returns to the controller, the correct tags are already applied.

It's not zero-touch, but it saves a lot of time. 😄

I am not a Cisco Meraki employee. My suggestions are based on documentation of Meraki best practices and day-to-day experience.

Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
MinseK
Meraki Employee
Meraki Employee

Bulk AP Naming changes are one of topics that we are trying to tackle and Catalyst Center offer similar services as part of AP Config workflow. 

AlexanderN
Meraki Employee All-Star Meraki Employee All-Star
Meraki Employee All-Star

IMO, this feature will have a big positive impact to make AP RMA and new deployment more seamless. Will it solve for every possible corner case like SecurePort? Of course not! However, we can always make MVP+ additional later.

 

Free free to submit enhancement requests via https://ciscospinfra.ideas.aha.io/

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.