A New MS version is out : MS 17.2.1

RaphaelL
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

A New MS version is out : MS 17.2.1

General important notes

  • MS17 introduces a change to the default login credentials for the device local status page, using "admin" as the username, and the device serial number (upper case with dashes) as the password

Ms12x important notes

  • MS 16 introduced DAI on MS100 series platforms. If you are upgrading to a current release from MS 15 or earlier please ensure trusted ports and/or DAI-allow lists are configured prior to upgrading.

New feature highlights

  • DOM (Digital Optical Monitoring)
  • Intelligent Capture
  • RSPAN and VLAN Based SPAN
  • SmartPorts

New ms130x feature highlights

  • Adaptive Policy on MS130X/R models

General fixed issues

  • All new LAG configurations will block redundant links if the connected device is not configured for LACP. This change fixes an issue where switches would sometimes move LAG ports to an active forwarding state prior to LACP convergence, creating the potential for loops. The change does not apply to existing LAG configurations.
  • Corrected the Local Status Page to show the 1 Gbps (forced) option, previously mislabeled as 1 Gbps (auto)
  • Fixed a bug that caused some clients using Hybrid, 802.1X, or MAB Access Policies to fail to authenticate after a switch reboot
  • Port-bounce CoA commands now correctly cycle PoE ports
  • Resolved an issue that caused some clients to be incorrectly added to a configured Guest VLAN when authenticated via RADIUS immediately after a switch reboot
  • Resolved an issue that prevented some MS210 and MS225 devices from correctly releasing MAC addresses from the MAC forwarding table
  • Resolved an issue that sometimes caused MS350 switches to remove existing L3 SVIs when enabling Auto-stacking

Ms120 fixed issues

  • Fixed a bug that prevented MS120-48 switches from correctly forwarding multicast traffic on ports 25-48
  • Resolved a bug that caused Epson POS printers to fail to authenticate when using MAB hybrid auth access policies

Ms12x fixed issues

  • Fixed an issue that prevented MS120 and MS125 switches from forwarding link-local multicast (224.0.0.x) traffic when 'Flood unknown multicast traffic' was disabled

Ms130 fixed issues

  • Fixed a bug that caused some MS130-X switches to experience slow upstream when connected directly to an MX device via an mGig port

Ms225 fixed issues

  • Resolved an issue that caused some MS225-48FP devices to become unresponsive and fail to forward traffic until rebooted

Ms350 fixed issues

  • Fixed a bug that prevented cable tests from correctly functioning on mGig ports

Ms35x fixed issues

  • Resolved an issue that caused some MS350-24X and MS355 switches to fail to negotiate 802.3bt UPoE LLDP connections

General known issues

  • LACP links may take up to two minutes to come back up when the Active Member of a stack reboots
  • On MS250 and MS350 switches, MAC addresses learned via AGGR are not removed when LAG ports are disabled. Mac addresses will be removed correctly within 5 minutes of reenabling LAG ports.
  • RADIUS communications may not recover after an initial failure when Critical Auth is enabled
  • Some switches may encounter an error, "incompatible configuration for attributes: allowed_vlans" when attempting to aggregate ports regardless of allowed VLANs configured in Dashboard

Ms120 known issues

  • Switches may fail to provide PoE power to legacy access points (always present)

Ms225 known issues

  • In rare circumstances MS225 switches may encounter a software crash that results in a reboot

Ms250 known issues

  • In rare circumstances MS250 switches using Multi-Domain Hybrid auth access policies may enter a 'port not forwarding' state, sending clients to the Guest VLAN until the switch is rebooted

Ms355 known issues

  • When reconnecting a stack cable between MS355-48X2 swithces a stack member may go offline until both switches are rebooted

Ms35x known issues

  • In rare instances, stack ports fail to initialize after an upgrade (always present)
  • Incorrect SFP port mappings may disrupt SFP functionality
  • Switches may experience an unexpected reboot (present since MS 15)

Ms425 known issues

  • In rare circumstances MS425 switches may encounter a software crash that results in a reboot
  • MS425s in stack configurations may periodically trigger New DHCP Server alerts that include mismatched VLANs/subnets
  • Powering off the active switch in a MS425 stack may result in up to 5 minutes of downtime while the stack reconverges
13 Replies 13
RaphaelL
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

Ms225 known issues

  • In rare circumstances MS225 switches may encounter a software crash that results in a reboot

Ms35x known issues

  • Switches may experience an unexpected reboot (present since MS 15)

 

#Pain

 

RWelch
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

#Agree100%

If you found this post helpful, please give it Kudos. If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
TyShawn
Head in the Cloud

MS425 KNOWN ISSUES

  • In rare circumstances, MS425 switches may encounter a software crash that results in a reboot

same issue and one that is keeping us from pushing these firmware out.

If you found this post helpful, please give it Kudos. If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
RWelch
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

I upgraded one of two MS425s to MS17.2.1.  It felt like it took an eternity but it did upgrade.  My other MS425 will be upgraded at the next maintenance window….hope it doesn’t take as long as the one I did tonight.

If you found this post helpful, please give it Kudos. If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
Bovie2K
Getting noticed

FWIW I'm running MS 17.1.4 and haven't been hit yet but I agree. It would be nice to know that the rare circumstances are.

nlev
Here to help

Upgraded one of our networks. The MS425 took a while but eventually updated. The MS320 stayed on Upgrade Status: Started for a long time and eventually changed to Upgrade Status: -   They still show Firmware Version: Not running configured version.  Does this mean the update failed? Was MS 17.2.1 intended to be made available to the out of support MS320 or were they supposed to stay on an older version?

RWelch
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

IMG_0161.jpegMS320s can run current firmware.

Product Firmware Version Restrictions 

If you found this post helpful, please give it Kudos. If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
RWelch
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

My MS425 showed the same for a LONG time but did finally upgrade.

 

never had an upgrade take as long or show the same status for as long.

 

Firmware Version: Not running configured version

If you found this post helpful, please give it Kudos. If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
nlev
Here to help

It's been several hours now and the MS320 switches are still showing "Not running configured version". I'll ask Meraki support but previously they said "these switches are end of support and we will not be able to troubleshoot"

cmr
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

I like this change, the CS switches always seemed to work this way and I much prefer it:

 

General fixed issues

  • All new LAG configurations will block redundant links if the connected device is not configured for LACP. This change fixes an issue where switches would sometimes move LAG ports to an active forwarding state prior to LACP convergence, creating the potential for loops. The change does not apply to existing LAG configurations

 

I would however like the port status LEDs to reflect the blocking...

If my answer solves your problem please click Accept as Solution so others can benefit from it.
rhbirkelund
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

I think perhaps that if more details were provided on which conditions these "unexpected reboots" would occur, it might help in deciding whether or not to upgrade.

When reading between the lines, it kind of implies that there are certain circumstances that need to be met for these unexpected reboots to occur.

 

If it's just a general disclaimer, Meraki might as well just add that as a permanent known issue, to every firmware from now on.

LinkedIn ::: https://blog.rhbirkelund.dk/

Like what you see? - Give a Kudo ## Did it answer your question? - Mark it as a Solution 🙂

All code examples are provided as is. Responsibility for Code execution lies solely your own.
RaphaelL
Kind of a big deal
Kind of a big deal

^this 

 

Also , why is this version already promoted to stable if it contains "unexpected reboots" ?

 

17.2.1 is not a patch from 17.1.4. it is a minor release.

YoeriOppelaar1
Here to help

Thanks for the new release, looks very promising,

 

But is there any indication when the following known issue is fixed: 

  • RADIUS communications may not recover after an initial failure when Critical Auth is enabled

 

It in the software for multiple releases, it really impacted my customers endpoints. 

Although i use a workaround now, which works for now, i would like to stick with the dashboard provided solutions as close as possible.

 

 

Get notified when there are additional replies to this discussion.
Welcome to the Meraki Community!
To start contributing, simply sign in with your Cisco ID. If you don't yet have a Cisco ID, you can sign up.
Labels