- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
2 Part stacking question
Part 1: I have a MS225 in use now, two new MS210s and stacking cables. Can I create a stack with all 3 switches and not lose the port config on the one existing switch?
Part 2: I want to have have this stack to have multiple connections to the 2 "Core" Cisco 3850 switches. I assume I would just aggregate several ports as the uplink trunk doing the mirroring this on the "Core" or is there a better way to do this?
Thanks in advance for any help.
note the reply from @DarrenOC that answers question 1, the existing MS225 should keep its config when added to the stack.
Solved! Go to solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@DerikA a when you do create your port channels on the Catalyst side make sure you’re using LACP for the aggregation - that’s the only method that the Meraki switches support.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @DerikA
@as per the below document you can’t physically stack an MS250 and MS210. This is only possible with MS210 and MS225’s
https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Stacking/Switch_Stacks
https://www.linkedin.com/in/darrenoconnor/
I'm not an employee of Cisco/Meraki. My posts are based on Meraki best practice and what has worked for me in the field.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@DerikA you can bundle connections together for performance and availability and like the 3850s a single port channel can have ports from multiple switches in the stack.
Unfortunately as @DarrenOC said, you cannot stack MS250s and MS210s.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@DerikA a when you do create your port channels on the Catalyst side make sure you’re using LACP for the aggregation - that’s the only method that the Meraki switches support.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Sorry, I type-o’d the switch types. They are an existing MS225 and two new MS210s. I’m updating the original post.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@DerikA you are all good to go then, we have multiple MS225/MS210 mixed stacks and they work nicely, ours are even connected to 3850 stacks, but we use the 10Gb SFP+ ports as uplinks with STP blocking one port rather than using port channels as we don't need 20Gb throughput.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@cmr OK, will the existing config on the MS225 stay when I create the stack or will I need to program it after making that stack?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@DerikA , all existing switch config will remain. Sounds like you’ve been burnt before by stacking legacy Cisco switches!
https://www.linkedin.com/in/darrenoconnor/
I'm not an employee of Cisco/Meraki. My posts are based on Meraki best practice and what has worked for me in the field.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @DerikA , then you’re good to go. Stack away.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/darrenoconnor/
I'm not an employee of Cisco/Meraki. My posts are based on Meraki best practice and what has worked for me in the field.
