- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Vlan overlaps with static route
Hello everyone,
I have a client using an internet box with a dedicated public IP address , and in order to connect to his remote sites, he uses a VPN solution on another router on his LAN .
I will be replacing the first BOX with a new ISP BOX and a meraki MX85 .
in the current situation, my client LAN subnet is 192.168.1.0/24 so to connect to the remote sites he directs all traffic to the router on the LAN , via next hop 192.168.1.250/24.
the issue is that have to put the same old config as it is on the MX .
LAN Subnet 192.168.1.0/24 and static routes with the 192.168.1.250/24 as next hop .
but this is not possible since the Meraki sees the Next hop in the LAN and doesn't allow the creation of the routes.
Is there any way I can overcome this without changing the next hop on that router on the LAN and without changing the LAN subnet on the MX ?
Thank you in advance .
Solved! Go to solution.
- Labels:
-
Firewall
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I've performed a test here and worked as expected.
Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Your static route does not make sense. What is the destination subnet or IP?
Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
he has many routes to remote sites /24 using this nexthop.
the 192.168.1.250 is used by another router on the LAN that has the vpn solution on it .
and the LAN of this site is also 192.168.1.0/24 , so When Meraki wants to create the route sees that the next hop belong to the LAN and then can't validate it .
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I've performed a test here and worked as expected.
Please, if this post was useful, leave your kudos and mark it as solved.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ooh ok thank you , I'll try that again .
I'v been getting this message saying that the route overlaps with a vlan on the MX .
Thank you for your time and support 🙂 !!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
i had a same issue
