I've managed and assessed a few RFPs/Tenders for public and private institutions in my time.
If I made a post such as the one you have made in a community forum, it would result in Meraki being excluded from the list of possible vendors and not being considered as a solution provider.
If the project was of significant value, other potential vendors may even attempt to exclude Meraki's parent corporation from the project.
I doubt these are the types of outcome you are seeking.
@uberseehandel
I've managed and assessed a few RFPs/Tenders for public and private institutions in my time.
If I made a post such as the one you have made in a community forum, it would result in Meraki being excluded from the list of possible vendors and not being considered as a solution provider.
If the project was of significant value, other potential vendors may even attempt to exclude Meraki's parent corporation from the project.
I doubt these are the types of outcome you are seeking.
@uberseehandel
@PhilipDAth wrote:How about the specification that the devices must have the Meraki trademark on them?
Now you are sounding like Oracle's NZ manager. You left out having the US Ambassador talk to the Prime Minister to explain that <name any Ministry in Wellington> does not understand the issues, and that Oracle is looking after the nation's vital interests.
This is actually easy to combat.
(shakes head) These Bay Area firms are all the same
@uberseehandel
