Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About Trust
Trust
Comes here often
Member since Feb 9, 2023
Nov 24 2023
Community Record
18
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Nov 23 2023
11:15 PM
Hi Guys, an uplink is sporadically displayed as down. However, VPN traffic is transmitted without any problems. I looked at the Meraki documentation and ran the failover connectivity test over Internet 2. It works. Also the outbound IP addresses and ports from the firewall overview are all open I am looking for possible solutions. Thank you very much
... View more
Nov 17 2023
2:28 AM
Hi, I want to establish independent non-Meraki VPN connections to the same destination with multiple MX68 devices. Are the Site-to-Site connections configured globally in Meraki and not on each MX itself, right? Do I need to create a separate network tag for each MX, set up a tunnel for each MX, and then assign the individual MX tag to each tunnel? Thanks
... View more
Jul 14 2023
5:23 AM
Hi guys and thanks for your answers. I have followed these instructions. https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Layer_3_Switching/Layer_3_Switch_Example This is my Transit VLAN and on the Switch as an example the VLAN 340 on the switch. As DHCP Relay I have chosen the Transit VLAN This is my static route on the MX and the DHCP server on the MX this is my configuration for the switchport this way I have created three VLANs on the switch and DHCP servers on the MX. I am not sure where my mistake is. I hope I have described everything understandably and you can help me. Thanks a lot
... View more
Jul 12 2023
11:37 PM
Hello people, has anyone ever seen these errors and can tell me the reason? The errors always occur at XX:29:25 and XX:09:25. - The clients are all configured to DHCP. - The VLANs are configured Layer 3 on the switches. - The DHCP server is on the MX84 (relay). Here is the configuration of the switch ports Thank you
... View more
Jun 15 2023
1:00 AM
Hi, has anyone found out where to find the new ACL hit counter?
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
ACLs
Jun 8 2023
10:24 PM
thank you for your answer. That's exactly how I wanted to do it. My question was only, if there are experiences from the community, which manufacturer or router model is best for Meraki. I have read about a few problems with a few routers.
... View more
Jun 8 2023
3:35 AM
Oh sorry I wasn't quite sure how to describe it. Yes exactly it is about the ISP router. I have thought of a Draytek Vigor 2766 ISP1 > Draytek1 > MS Switch1 > MX84 pri and spare ISP2 > Draytek2 > MS Switch2 > MX84 pri and spare There will be many users who have experience with different routers and can give a recommendation.
... View more
Jun 7 2023
10:34 PM
hello all, I have a question about the warm spare with two mx84. So far we have equipped our networks with mx68. The mx68 are connected to two different ISPs. In front of each uplink is a modem installed and the dial-up takes the MX via PPPoE. Now I want to operate two MX84 in warm spare. In this constellation, dial-up via PPPoE will no longer work. As I understood the Meraki documentation, I need two upstream routers and a virtual IP for the two MX84. Then the uplinks via two switches to the two MXes. My question is now with which routers you have good experience. It does not have to be expensive or offer many features. - A stable connection - respond to ICMP packets - forward all ports to the MXes Thanks all
... View more
May 17 2023
4:06 AM
Sorry, I didn't read your whole post. I test the connection in both directions The gateway is on the switch where I also configure the ACL. The DHCP server is on the MX. But that should not matter
... View more
May 17 2023
3:45 AM
Hi alemabrahao, then I don't understand something correctly. I would like to block the clients in the subnet 10.99.28.0/24 from accessing each other. Only 10.99.28.2 should have access to 10.99.28.3. Here are the two clients with the following rules: and now I have deleted a rule
... View more
May 17 2023
3:13 AM
Hi, I don't want all clients to be able to access each other. Only clients defined by me should have these rights. Do I always have to create rules for both directions? it does not work like that With this setting it works I am a bit surprised because I only have to configure one direction in the appliance firewall. I hope you can briefly explain the differences. Thanks a lot
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
ACLs
Mar 17 2023
5:08 AM
Unfortunately, it doesn't work straightforwardly. As soon as I have a solution, I will post it here.
... View more
Feb 9 2023
6:37 AM
Solved it. Meraki regulates this automatically as soon as the opposite side is correct.
... View more
Feb 9 2023
4:52 AM
Thank you for the quick reply. Windows Server 2022 with Switch embedded Teaming does not support LACP.
... View more
Feb 9 2023
4:41 AM
Hello all, I have a question. So far I have set up Nic-Teaming on my Windows servers based on LBFO. I have aggregated ports on two Meraki switches and let the server communicate via LACP. With Windows 2022, Switch Embedded Teaming is the favored technology. However, Switch Embedded Teaming does not support LACP. Of course, I can enable LBFO Teaming via Powershell, but I would like to use Switch Embedded Teaming. How do I have to configure the Meraki switches to use Switch Embedded Teaming correctly? Thank you
... View more
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
